84 lines
2.9 KiB
Plaintext
84 lines
2.9 KiB
Plaintext
From fork-admin@xent.com Wed Sep 11 13:49:23 2002
|
|
Return-Path: <fork-admin@xent.com>
|
|
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
|
|
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
|
|
by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13ECF16F03
|
|
for <jm@localhost>; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 13:49:23 +0100 (IST)
|
|
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
|
|
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
|
|
for jm@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 11 Sep 2002 13:49:23 +0100 (IST)
|
|
Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
|
|
(8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8AIcYC11645 for <jm@jmason.org>;
|
|
Tue, 10 Sep 2002 19:38:38 +0100
|
|
Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
|
|
with ESMTP id 5ADDE2940A0; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 11:35:04 -0700 (PDT)
|
|
Delivered-To: fork@example.com
|
|
Received: from localhost.localdomain (pm1-15.sba1.netlojix.net
|
|
[207.71.218.63]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA94C29409A for
|
|
<fork@xent.com>; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 11:34:34 -0700 (PDT)
|
|
Received: (from dave@localhost) by maltesecat (8.8.7/8.8.7a) id LAA10179;
|
|
Tue, 10 Sep 2002 11:21:56 -0700
|
|
Message-Id: <200209101821.LAA10179@maltesecat>
|
|
To: fork@example.com
|
|
Subject: Re: Tech's Major Decline
|
|
In-Reply-To: Message from fork-request@xent.com of
|
|
"Sun, 01 Sep 2002 20:24:01 PDT."
|
|
<20020902032401.29860.6932.Mailman@lair.xent.com>
|
|
From: Dave Long <dl@silcom.com>
|
|
Sender: fork-admin@xent.com
|
|
Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com
|
|
X-Beenthere: fork@example.com
|
|
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
|
|
Precedence: bulk
|
|
List-Help: <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=help>
|
|
List-Post: <mailto:fork@example.com>
|
|
List-Subscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>, <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=subscribe>
|
|
List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare <fork.xent.com>
|
|
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>,
|
|
<mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=unsubscribe>
|
|
List-Archive: <http://xent.com/pipermail/fork/>
|
|
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 11:21:56 -0700
|
|
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.5 required=7.0
|
|
tests=AWL,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
|
|
version=2.50-cvs
|
|
X-Spam-Level:
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure which way to make
|
|
the old bits call on this:
|
|
|
|
[A] <http://www.xent.com/pipermail/fork/2002-September/014448.html>
|
|
was posted well after
|
|
[B] <http://www.xent.com/pipermail/fork/2002-August/014351.html>
|
|
was in the archives, but then
|
|
again, [B] didn't bother with
|
|
any commentary (new bits).
|
|
|
|
If you two can agree upon who
|
|
was at fault, penance will be
|
|
to explain how feedback phase
|
|
is affected by time lags, and
|
|
tie that in to the spontaneous
|
|
generation of "business cycles"
|
|
in the Beer Game. *
|
|
|
|
-Dave
|
|
|
|
* <http://web.mit.edu/jsterman/www/SDG/beergame.html>
|
|
|
|
see also:
|
|
|
|
Explaining Capacity Overshoot and Price War: Misperceptions
|
|
of Feedback in Competitive Growth Markets
|
|
<http://web.mit.edu/jsterman/www/B&B_Rev.html>
|
|
|
|
in which the scenario 4 (margin
|
|
oriented tit for tat) seems close
|
|
to the strategy described in:
|
|
|
|
"game theoretical gandhi / more laptops"
|
|
<http://www.xent.com/aug00/0200.html>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|