68 lines
2.8 KiB
Plaintext
68 lines
2.8 KiB
Plaintext
From craig@deersoft.com Fri Aug 23 11:03:54 2002
|
|
Return-Path: <craig@deersoft.com>
|
|
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.netnoteinc.com
|
|
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
|
|
by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5BBB44156
|
|
for <jm@localhost>; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 06:03:29 -0400 (EDT)
|
|
Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1]
|
|
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
|
|
for jm@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 23 Aug 2002 11:03:29 +0100 (IST)
|
|
Received: from hall.mail.mindspring.net (hall.mail.mindspring.net
|
|
[207.69.200.60]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
|
|
g7MISAZ19627 for <jm@jmason.org>; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 19:28:10 +0100
|
|
Received: from user-105nd99.dialup.mindspring.com ([64.91.181.41]
|
|
helo=belphegore.hughes-family.org) by hall.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp
|
|
(Exim 3.33 #1) id 17hwgo-00049c-00; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 14:28:14 -0400
|
|
Received: from balam.hughes-family.org
|
|
(adsl-67-118-234-50.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [67.118.234.50]) by
|
|
belphegore.hughes-family.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05665A3FD9;
|
|
Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:28:12 -0700 (PDT)
|
|
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:28:13 -0700
|
|
Subject: Re: [SAdev] 2.40 RELEASE PROCESS: mass-check status, folks?
|
|
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
|
|
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v482)
|
|
Cc: "Malte S. Stretz" <msquadrat.nospamplease@gmx.net>,
|
|
SpamAssassin-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
|
|
SpamAssassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
|
|
To: yyyy@spamassassin.taint.org (Justin Mason)
|
|
From: "Craig R.Hughes" <craig@deersoft.com>
|
|
In-Reply-To: <20020822172428.4FCCD43F99@phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com>
|
|
Message-Id: <EB0AF9F0-B5FC-11D6-A91E-00039396ECF2@deersoft.com>
|
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
|
|
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.482)
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Thursday, August 22, 2002, at 10:24 AM, Justin Mason wrote:
|
|
|
|
> I plan to
|
|
>
|
|
> 1. figure out the freqs tonight, suggest what tests to drop
|
|
> 2. wait for comments
|
|
> 3. drop tests that nobody cares about tomorrow
|
|
> 4. sed out the dropped tests from the mass-check logs
|
|
|
|
This step is unneccesary -- unless you've changed the scripts
|
|
much, any test in the logs which aren't in the rules files will
|
|
just be ignored I think. You do seem to have changed the
|
|
logs-to-c script and removed the bit where you could specify
|
|
immutable tests at the top -- I took a brief glance through the
|
|
code and couldn't fully make out how it had changed. I think we
|
|
want to be able to specify immutable test scores though in there
|
|
somewhere -- or is that now handled by the tflags stuff? For
|
|
the last couple releases, any test which occurred infrequently
|
|
(by thumb-in-the-wind subjective criteria) I set to have
|
|
immutable scores, as well as a handful of other rules.
|
|
|
|
> 5. kick off the GA
|
|
>
|
|
> BTW I'll be away this weekend at Linuxbierwanderung, so Craig,
|
|
> you might
|
|
> have to run the GA. ;)
|
|
|
|
Shouldn't be a problem. Assuming I can get the darned thing to
|
|
compile :)
|
|
|
|
C
|
|
|
|
|