From craig@deersoft.com Fri Aug 23 11:03:54 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.netnoteinc.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5BBB44156 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 06:03:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 23 Aug 2002 11:03:29 +0100 (IST) Received: from hall.mail.mindspring.net (hall.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.60]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7MISAZ19627 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 19:28:10 +0100 Received: from user-105nd99.dialup.mindspring.com ([64.91.181.41] helo=belphegore.hughes-family.org) by hall.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 17hwgo-00049c-00; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 14:28:14 -0400 Received: from balam.hughes-family.org (adsl-67-118-234-50.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [67.118.234.50]) by belphegore.hughes-family.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05665A3FD9; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:28:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:28:13 -0700 Subject: Re: [SAdev] 2.40 RELEASE PROCESS: mass-check status, folks? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v482) Cc: "Malte S. Stretz" , SpamAssassin-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, SpamAssassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net To: yyyy@spamassassin.taint.org (Justin Mason) From: "Craig R.Hughes" In-Reply-To: <20020822172428.4FCCD43F99@phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com> Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.482) On Thursday, August 22, 2002, at 10:24 AM, Justin Mason wrote: > I plan to > > 1. figure out the freqs tonight, suggest what tests to drop > 2. wait for comments > 3. drop tests that nobody cares about tomorrow > 4. sed out the dropped tests from the mass-check logs This step is unneccesary -- unless you've changed the scripts much, any test in the logs which aren't in the rules files will just be ignored I think. You do seem to have changed the logs-to-c script and removed the bit where you could specify immutable tests at the top -- I took a brief glance through the code and couldn't fully make out how it had changed. I think we want to be able to specify immutable test scores though in there somewhere -- or is that now handled by the tflags stuff? For the last couple releases, any test which occurred infrequently (by thumb-in-the-wind subjective criteria) I set to have immutable scores, as well as a handful of other rules. > 5. kick off the GA > > BTW I'll be away this weekend at Linuxbierwanderung, so Craig, > you might > have to run the GA. ;) Shouldn't be a problem. Assuming I can get the darned thing to compile :) C