107 lines
4.7 KiB
Plaintext
107 lines
4.7 KiB
Plaintext
From fork-admin@xent.com Mon Sep 9 19:27:33 2002
|
|
Return-Path: <fork-admin@xent.com>
|
|
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.spamassassin.taint.org
|
|
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
|
|
by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CB1516EFC
|
|
for <jm@localhost>; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 19:27:33 +0100 (IST)
|
|
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
|
|
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
|
|
for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 09 Sep 2002 19:27:33 +0100 (IST)
|
|
Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
|
|
(8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g89EDJC18586 for <jm@jmason.org>;
|
|
Mon, 9 Sep 2002 15:13:19 +0100
|
|
Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
|
|
with ESMTP id 396C72942BB; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 07:10:04 -0700 (PDT)
|
|
Delivered-To: fork@spamassassin.taint.org
|
|
Received: from venus.phpwebhosting.com (venus.phpwebhosting.com
|
|
[64.29.16.27]) by xent.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7FCFA2940EC for
|
|
<fork@xent.com>; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 07:09:53 -0700 (PDT)
|
|
Received: (qmail 19477 invoked by uid 508); 9 Sep 2002 14:12:38 -0000
|
|
Received: from unknown (HELO hydrogen.leitl.org) (217.80.40.112) by
|
|
venus.phpwebhosting.com with SMTP; 9 Sep 2002 14:12:38 -0000
|
|
Received: from localhost (eugen@localhost) by hydrogen.leitl.org
|
|
(8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g89ECa407063; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 16:12:36 +0200
|
|
X-Authentication-Warning: hydrogen.leitl.org: eugen owned process doing -bs
|
|
From: Eugen Leitl <eugen@leitl.org>
|
|
To: <bitbitch@magnesium.net>
|
|
Cc: <fork@spamassassin.taint.org>
|
|
Subject: Re[2]: Selling Wedded Bliss (was Re: Ouch...)
|
|
In-Reply-To: <10770315074.20020909094137@magnesium.net>
|
|
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0209091553450.32400-100000@hydrogen.leitl.org>
|
|
MIME-Version: 1.0
|
|
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
|
|
Sender: fork-admin@xent.com
|
|
Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com
|
|
X-Beenthere: fork@spamassassin.taint.org
|
|
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
|
|
Precedence: bulk
|
|
List-Help: <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=help>
|
|
List-Post: <mailto:fork@spamassassin.taint.org>
|
|
List-Subscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>, <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=subscribe>
|
|
List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare <fork.xent.com>
|
|
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>,
|
|
<mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=unsubscribe>
|
|
List-Archive: <http://xent.com/pipermail/fork/>
|
|
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 16:12:36 +0200 (CEST)
|
|
|
|
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002 bitbitch@magnesium.net wrote:
|
|
|
|
> So Eugen, how many of your homo friends have -had- 3k lovers?
|
|
|
|
Just one. Not everybody does that. Most of them are now dead, anyway.
|
|
|
|
> Do you know anyone, outside of meybee Wilt Chamberlin and a few of the
|
|
> gang-bang porn queens who -have- had even 1.5k lovers?
|
|
|
|
Yes. Notice that I've specifically excluded sex industry. That be
|
|
cheating.
|
|
|
|
> Eegads, if you're hypothesizing numbers like -that- Eugen, you at
|
|
> least owe it to FoRK to back that shit up.
|
|
|
|
Ain't done no hypothesizing. Anecdotal evidence'R'Us. Couldn't you just
|
|
Google, or something?
|
|
|
|
> Otherwise we're liable to assume rampant unfounded homophobia and that
|
|
> would just be a lose.
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I'm a gay Jew Nazi Muslim who's also a lead character on Kaz's
|
|
underworld. Can we go on with the programme now?
|
|
|
|
> Just a quick assumption here. I'm not a math geek or anything, but
|
|
> assuming 1 lover every day, that would be like at least one lover
|
|
> everyday for 8 years and some change. I don't know about you, but
|
|
> very very few of us are -that- lucky (or even close to that lucky)
|
|
|
|
Which was my point. Gurls don't do hyperpromiscuity as a life style. It's
|
|
interesting that you're launching into a diatribe, and threaten using
|
|
instant argument (just add hominem) instead of assuming I might be not
|
|
just pulling this whole thing out my nether orifice.
|
|
|
|
> and after awhile, even the sexaholics get bored and have to mingle
|
|
> something new into their weekends. You really are assumiing that the
|
|
> homosexual population is a) that large in a given area (The meccas
|
|
|
|
You ever been to San Francisco?
|
|
|
|
> might qualify, but try finding that kind of homosexual population in
|
|
> say, Tulsa, Oklahoma or Manchester, NH (Tho Manchester does have quite
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I think it could be also difficult finding a gay bathhouse in Thule,
|
|
Greenland. Or parts of central Africa. To think of it, both Oort and
|
|
Kuiper belts are utterly devoid of gay people as well. Isn't this
|
|
remarkable?
|
|
|
|
> a few nifty gaybars, but thats a different story) b) that bored/sex
|
|
> obsessed/recreationally free to pursue sex that often, with that many
|
|
> partners or that they'd even WANT that many partners.
|
|
|
|
This doesn't happen because it couldn't happen. No one would want to.
|
|
Because you feel that way. Correct?
|
|
|
|
> Qualify yourself, or at least lower your outrageous numbers.
|
|
|
|
I didn't expect so much reflexive knee-jerking on this list.
|
|
|
|
|