From fork-admin@xent.com Mon Sep 9 19:27:33 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.spamassassin.taint.org Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1]) by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CB1516EFC for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 19:27:33 +0100 (IST) Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 09 Sep 2002 19:27:33 +0100 (IST) Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g89EDJC18586 for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 15:13:19 +0100 Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 396C72942BB; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 07:10:04 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: fork@spamassassin.taint.org Received: from venus.phpwebhosting.com (venus.phpwebhosting.com [64.29.16.27]) by xent.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7FCFA2940EC for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 07:09:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 19477 invoked by uid 508); 9 Sep 2002 14:12:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hydrogen.leitl.org) (217.80.40.112) by venus.phpwebhosting.com with SMTP; 9 Sep 2002 14:12:38 -0000 Received: from localhost (eugen@localhost) by hydrogen.leitl.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g89ECa407063; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 16:12:36 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: hydrogen.leitl.org: eugen owned process doing -bs From: Eugen Leitl To: Cc: Subject: Re[2]: Selling Wedded Bliss (was Re: Ouch...) In-Reply-To: <10770315074.20020909094137@magnesium.net> Message-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: fork-admin@xent.com Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com X-Beenthere: fork@spamassassin.taint.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 16:12:36 +0200 (CEST) On Mon, 9 Sep 2002 bitbitch@magnesium.net wrote: > So Eugen, how many of your homo friends have -had- 3k lovers? Just one. Not everybody does that. Most of them are now dead, anyway. > Do you know anyone, outside of meybee Wilt Chamberlin and a few of the > gang-bang porn queens who -have- had even 1.5k lovers? Yes. Notice that I've specifically excluded sex industry. That be cheating. > Eegads, if you're hypothesizing numbers like -that- Eugen, you at > least owe it to FoRK to back that shit up. Ain't done no hypothesizing. Anecdotal evidence'R'Us. Couldn't you just Google, or something? > Otherwise we're liable to assume rampant unfounded homophobia and that > would just be a lose. Yeah, I'm a gay Jew Nazi Muslim who's also a lead character on Kaz's underworld. Can we go on with the programme now? > Just a quick assumption here. I'm not a math geek or anything, but > assuming 1 lover every day, that would be like at least one lover > everyday for 8 years and some change. I don't know about you, but > very very few of us are -that- lucky (or even close to that lucky) Which was my point. Gurls don't do hyperpromiscuity as a life style. It's interesting that you're launching into a diatribe, and threaten using instant argument (just add hominem) instead of assuming I might be not just pulling this whole thing out my nether orifice. > and after awhile, even the sexaholics get bored and have to mingle > something new into their weekends. You really are assumiing that the > homosexual population is a) that large in a given area (The meccas You ever been to San Francisco? > might qualify, but try finding that kind of homosexual population in > say, Tulsa, Oklahoma or Manchester, NH (Tho Manchester does have quite Yeah, I think it could be also difficult finding a gay bathhouse in Thule, Greenland. Or parts of central Africa. To think of it, both Oort and Kuiper belts are utterly devoid of gay people as well. Isn't this remarkable? > a few nifty gaybars, but thats a different story) b) that bored/sex > obsessed/recreationally free to pursue sex that often, with that many > partners or that they'd even WANT that many partners. This doesn't happen because it couldn't happen. No one would want to. Because you feel that way. Correct? > Qualify yourself, or at least lower your outrageous numbers. I didn't expect so much reflexive knee-jerking on this list.