31 lines
1.2 KiB
Plaintext
31 lines
1.2 KiB
Plaintext
Return-Path: neale@woozle.org
|
|
Delivery-Date: Sat Sep 7 06:48:17 2002
|
|
From: neale@woozle.org (Neale Pickett)
|
|
Date: 06 Sep 2002 22:48:17 -0700
|
|
Subject: [Spambayes] Ditching WordInfo
|
|
In-Reply-To: <200209070533.g875XN813509@pcp02138704pcs.reston01.va.comcast.net>
|
|
References: <LNBBLJKPBEHFEDALKOLCOEKKBCAB.tim.one@comcast.net>
|
|
<w53n0qubcpj.fsf@woozle.org>
|
|
<200209070533.g875XN813509@pcp02138704pcs.reston01.va.comcast.net>
|
|
Message-ID: <w537khybba6.fsf@woozle.org>
|
|
|
|
So then, Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> is all like:
|
|
|
|
> Maybe. I batch messages using fetchmail (don't ask why), and adding
|
|
> .4 seconds per message for a batch of 50 (not untypical) feels like a
|
|
> real wait to me...
|
|
|
|
Yeesh. Sounds like what you need is something to kick up once and score
|
|
an entire mailbox.
|
|
|
|
Wait a second... So *that's* why you wanted -u.
|
|
|
|
If you can spare the memory, you might get better performance in this
|
|
case using the pickle store, since it only has to go to disk once (but
|
|
boy, does it ever go to disk!) I can't think of anything obvious to
|
|
speed things up once it's all loaded into memory, though. That's
|
|
profiler territory, and profiling is exactly the kind of optimization
|
|
I just said I wasn't going to do :)
|
|
|
|
Neale
|