25 lines
851 B
Plaintext
25 lines
851 B
Plaintext
Return-Path: anthony@interlink.com.au
|
|
Delivery-Date: Sat Sep 7 04:44:50 2002
|
|
From: anthony@interlink.com.au (Anthony Baxter)
|
|
Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2002 13:44:50 +1000
|
|
Subject: [Spambayes] understanding high false negative rate
|
|
In-Reply-To:
|
|
<200209062026.g86KQqJ03393@pcp02138704pcs.reston01.va.comcast.net>
|
|
Message-ID: <200209070344.g873io020676@localhost.localdomain>
|
|
|
|
|
|
> Looks like your ham corpus by and large has To: jeremy@alum.mit.edu in
|
|
> a header while your spam corpus by and large doesn't. But this one
|
|
> does.
|
|
|
|
Interestingly, for me, one of the highest value spam indicators was
|
|
the name of the mail host that the spam was delivered to, in the To:
|
|
line. So mail to info@gin.elax2.ekorp.com was pretty much a dead cert
|
|
for the filters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Anthony Baxter <anthony@interlink.com.au>
|
|
It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
|
|
|