36 lines
1.4 KiB
Plaintext
36 lines
1.4 KiB
Plaintext
Return-Path: barry@python.org
|
|
Delivery-Date: Fri Sep 6 15:28:12 2002
|
|
From: barry@python.org (Barry A. Warsaw)
|
|
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 10:28:12 -0400
|
|
Subject: [Spambayes] test sets?
|
|
References: <15735.50243.135743.32180@12-248-11-90.client.attbi.com>
|
|
<LNBBLJKPBEHFEDALKOLCIEFEBCAB.tim.one@comcast.net>
|
|
<20020906134417.GA16820@cthulhu.gerg.ca>
|
|
Message-ID: <15736.47996.84689.421662@anthem.wooz.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
>>>>> "GW" == Greg Ward <gward@python.net> writes:
|
|
|
|
GW> If you (and Guido, Barry, et. al.) prefer, I could change that
|
|
GW> last statement to "folder = None", so the mail won't be saved
|
|
GW> at all.
|
|
|
|
I don't care if the mail is foldered on python.org, but personal
|
|
messages regardless of who they're for, shouldn't be part of the
|
|
public spambayes repository unless specifically approved by both the
|
|
recipient and sender.
|
|
|
|
Note also that we are much more liberal about python.org/zope.org
|
|
mailing list traffic than most folks. Read list-managers for any
|
|
length of time and you'll find that there are a lot of people who
|
|
assert strict copyright over their collections, are very protective of
|
|
their traffic, and got really pissed when gmane just started
|
|
gatewaying their messages without asking.
|
|
|
|
Which might be an appropriate for their lists, but not for ours (don't
|
|
think I'm suggesting we do the same -- I /like/ our laissez-faire
|
|
approach).
|
|
|
|
But for personal email, we should be more careful.
|
|
-Barry
|