67 lines
3.0 KiB
Plaintext
67 lines
3.0 KiB
Plaintext
From secprog-return-487-jm=jmason.org@securityfocus.com Fri Sep 6 11:38:01 2002
|
|
Return-Path: <secprog-return-487-yyyy=example.com@securityfocus.com>
|
|
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
|
|
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
|
|
by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 837A816F69
|
|
for <jm@localhost>; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 11:36:36 +0100 (IST)
|
|
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
|
|
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
|
|
for jm@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 06 Sep 2002 11:36:36 +0100 (IST)
|
|
Received: from webnote.net (mail.webnote.net [193.120.211.219]) by
|
|
dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g869wSC29970 for
|
|
<jm@jmason.org>; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 10:58:28 +0100
|
|
Received: from outgoing.securityfocus.com (outgoing3.securityfocus.com
|
|
[66.38.151.27]) by webnote.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA18007 for
|
|
<jm@jmason.org>; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 20:40:22 +0100
|
|
Received: from lists.securityfocus.com (lists.securityfocus.com
|
|
[66.38.151.19]) by outgoing.securityfocus.com (Postfix) with QMQP id
|
|
A38F5A3139; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 10:51:19 -0600 (MDT)
|
|
Mailing-List: contact secprog-help@securityfocus.com; run by ezmlm
|
|
Precedence: bulk
|
|
List-Id: <secprog.list-id.securityfocus.com>
|
|
List-Post: <mailto:secprog@securityfocus.com>
|
|
List-Help: <mailto:secprog-help@securityfocus.com>
|
|
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:secprog-unsubscribe@securityfocus.com>
|
|
List-Subscribe: <mailto:secprog-subscribe@securityfocus.com>
|
|
Delivered-To: mailing list secprog@securityfocus.com
|
|
Delivered-To: moderator for secprog@securityfocus.com
|
|
Received: (qmail 28245 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2002 10:23:24 -0000
|
|
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
|
|
From: Yannick Gingras <ygingras@ygingras.net>
|
|
To: secprog@securityfocus.com
|
|
Subject: Re: Secure Sofware Key
|
|
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 06:39:04 -0400
|
|
User-Agent: KMail/1.4.2
|
|
References: <Pine.LNX.4.40.0209051340310.18579-100000@zambra.ispras.ru>
|
|
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.40.0209051340310.18579-100000@zambra.ispras.ru>
|
|
MIME-Version: 1.0
|
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
|
|
Message-Id: <200209050639.08199.ygingras@ygingras.net>
|
|
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-13.2 required=7.0
|
|
tests=BIG_BUCKS,FREE_MONEY,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,
|
|
QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,
|
|
SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_KMAIL
|
|
version=2.50-cvs
|
|
X-Spam-Level:
|
|
|
|
> However, cracking and reverse engineering tools are not so ubiquitous on
|
|
> UNIX as they are on Windows platform for two main reasons:
|
|
>
|
|
> 1. The main customers of commercial Unices (Solaris, HP-UX, Aix, SCO...)
|
|
> are respectable companies. They are ready to pay big bucks for software
|
|
> they need: the reputation matters.
|
|
>
|
|
> 2. Most software for free and open source Unices like Linux and xBSD (this
|
|
> software often may be used on commercial unices as well) is, well, free and
|
|
> open source.
|
|
|
|
Thanks to your answers, I start to see where I should head for. What are your
|
|
sugestions for protecting a 100% online requirement system ?
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Yannick Gingras
|
|
Coder for OBB : Observing Bantu-speaking Butanone
|
|
http://OpenBeatBox.org
|
|
|
|
|