50 lines
1.9 KiB
Plaintext
50 lines
1.9 KiB
Plaintext
From quinlan@pathname.com Thu Sep 26 10:59:48 2002
|
|
Return-Path: <quinlan@pathname.com>
|
|
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
|
|
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
|
|
by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0CCE16F16
|
|
for <jm@localhost>; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 10:59:47 +0100 (IST)
|
|
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
|
|
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
|
|
for jm@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 26 Sep 2002 10:59:47 +0100 (IST)
|
|
Received: from proton.pathname.com
|
|
(adsl-216-103-211-240.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [216.103.211.240]) by
|
|
dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8PKrgC13456 for
|
|
<jm@jmason.org>; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 21:53:42 +0100
|
|
Received: from quinlan by proton.pathname.com with local (Exim 3.35 #1
|
|
(Debian)) id 17uJAn-0006v7-00; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 13:54:17 -0700
|
|
To: yyyy@example.com (Justin Mason)
|
|
Cc: Theo Van Dinter <felicity@kluge.net>,
|
|
Spamassassin Devel List <spamassassin-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
|
|
Subject: Re: [SAdev] Have mass-check remove X-Spam-* headers?
|
|
References: <20020925163306.98BD616F18@example.com>
|
|
From: Daniel Quinlan <quinlan@pathname.com>
|
|
Date: 25 Sep 2002 13:54:17 -0700
|
|
In-Reply-To: yyyy@example.com's message of "Wed, 25 Sep 2002 17:32:59 +0100"
|
|
Message-Id: <yf21y7h3i4m.fsf@proton.pathname.com>
|
|
Lines: 15
|
|
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7
|
|
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.3 required=5.0
|
|
tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
|
|
REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES
|
|
version=2.50-cvs
|
|
X-Spam-Level:
|
|
|
|
jm@jmason.org (Justin Mason) writes:
|
|
|
|
> except for 1 thing: defanged MIME messages. that's a big problem.
|
|
> but if you didn't just *remove* the headers and instead reverted
|
|
> back to the X-Spam-Prev versions, it'd more-or-less work.
|
|
>
|
|
> (BTW fixed the downloads page ;)
|
|
|
|
&check now un-defangs MIME -- it was screwing up some of my mass-check
|
|
results (where SA-markup was present, yes).
|
|
|
|
If there ever was a warning about SA-markup in mass-check, it never
|
|
worked for me.
|
|
|
|
Dan
|
|
|
|
|