93 lines
4.5 KiB
Plaintext
93 lines
4.5 KiB
Plaintext
From spamassassin-talk-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Thu Aug 29 11:08:46 2002
|
|
Return-Path: <spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net>
|
|
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.netnoteinc.com
|
|
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
|
|
by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BB5A47C77
|
|
for <jm@localhost>; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 06:06:18 -0400 (EDT)
|
|
Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1]
|
|
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
|
|
for jm@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 29 Aug 2002 11:06:18 +0100 (IST)
|
|
Received: from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net
|
|
[216.136.171.252]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
|
|
g7T66TZ01029 for <jm-sa@jmason.org>; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 07:06:30 +0100
|
|
Received: from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13]
|
|
helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with
|
|
esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17kIQS-0006mo-00; Wed,
|
|
28 Aug 2002 23:05:04 -0700
|
|
Received: from yrex.com ([216.40.247.31] helo=host.yrex.com) by
|
|
usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with smtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id
|
|
17kIPo-0005vK-00 for <spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net>;
|
|
Wed, 28 Aug 2002 23:04:25 -0700
|
|
Received: (qmail 4581 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2002 06:04:22 -0000
|
|
Received: from mgm.dsl.xmission.com (HELO opus) (204.228.152.186) by
|
|
yrex.com with SMTP; 29 Aug 2002 06:04:22 -0000
|
|
From: "Michael Moncur" <mgm@starlingtech.com>
|
|
To: <spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net>
|
|
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] O.T. Habeus -- Why?
|
|
Message-Id: <NEBBKLEDELIODOCJHLPCKEJNNAAA.mgm@starlingtech.com>
|
|
MIME-Version: 1.0
|
|
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
|
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
|
|
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
|
|
X-Msmail-Priority: Normal
|
|
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
|
|
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
|
|
Importance: Normal
|
|
In-Reply-To: <yf2k7majkol.fsf@proton.pathname.com>
|
|
Sender: spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net
|
|
Errors-To: spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net
|
|
X-Beenthere: spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net
|
|
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net
|
|
Precedence: bulk
|
|
List-Help: <mailto:spamassassin-talk-request@example.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
|
|
List-Post: <mailto:spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net>
|
|
List-Subscribe: <https://example.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk>,
|
|
<mailto:spamassassin-talk-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
|
|
List-Id: Talk about SpamAssassin <spamassassin-talk.example.sourceforge.net>
|
|
List-Unsubscribe: <https://example.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk>,
|
|
<mailto:spamassassin-talk-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
|
|
List-Archive: <http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=spamassassin-talk>
|
|
X-Original-Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 00:04:14 -0600
|
|
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 00:04:14 -0600
|
|
X-Pyzor: Reported 0 times.
|
|
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.2 required=7.0
|
|
tests=IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
|
|
SPAM_PHRASE_03_05,USER_AGENT_OUTLOOK
|
|
version=2.40-cvs
|
|
X-Spam-Level:
|
|
|
|
> I think I've worked on SA enough to understand that I can localize a
|
|
> score. I'm just not comfortable with using SpamAssassin as a vehicle
|
|
> for drumming up your business at the expense of our user base.
|
|
|
|
This is exactly what I think. SpamAssassin has always been conservative
|
|
about adding unproven RBLs and such, and this should be the same.
|
|
|
|
> I think it would make more sense to start Habeas with a less aggressive
|
|
> score (one which will not give spammers a quick path into everyone's
|
|
> inbox) and after we've seen evidence that the system works, then we can
|
|
> increase the magnitude of the score.
|
|
|
|
I say start it with a zero score and put it in 70_cvs_rules_under_test like
|
|
any other unproven rule. Then score it based on actual results, not
|
|
promises. My corpus does not yet contain a single non-spam (or spam) message
|
|
with a Habeas mark. Based on that, it doesn't impress me and it wouldn't
|
|
impress the GA either. Rules with exactly the same statistics are being
|
|
dropped from SA right now, and I don't see why this should be any different.
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Michael Moncur mgm at starlingtech.com http://www.starlingtech.com/
|
|
"Furious activity is no substitute for understanding." --H. H. Williams
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------------------------------
|
|
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
|
|
Welcome to geek heaven.
|
|
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
|
|
_______________________________________________
|
|
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
|
|
Spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
|
|
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
|
|
|