71 lines
2.8 KiB
Plaintext
71 lines
2.8 KiB
Plaintext
From tony@svanstrom.com Wed Aug 28 10:56:41 2002
|
|
Return-Path: <tony@svanstrom.com>
|
|
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.netnoteinc.com
|
|
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
|
|
by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5927743F9B
|
|
for <jm@localhost>; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 05:56:37 -0400 (EDT)
|
|
Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1]
|
|
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
|
|
for jm@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 28 Aug 2002 10:56:37 +0100 (IST)
|
|
Received: from moon.campus.luth.se (root@moon.campus.luth.se
|
|
[130.240.202.158]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
|
|
g7RJIqZ22179 for <jm@jmason.org>; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 20:18:52 +0100
|
|
Received: from moon.campus.luth.se (tony@moon.campus.luth.se
|
|
[130.240.202.158]) by moon.campus.luth.se (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id
|
|
g7RJJ2Mg007856; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 21:19:02 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from
|
|
tony@svanstrom.com)
|
|
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 21:19:02 +0200 (CEST)
|
|
From: "Tony L. Svanstrom" <tony@svanstrom.com>
|
|
X-X-Sender: tony@moon.campus.luth.se
|
|
To: "Jason R. Mastaler" <jason-exp-1031164464.7f11b3@mastaler.com>
|
|
Cc: Justin Mason <yyyy@example.com>,
|
|
<spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net>, <tmda-users@tmda.net>
|
|
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Re: patent on TMDA-like system
|
|
In-Reply-To: <hhvg5wkv68.fsf@hrothgar.la.mastaler.com>
|
|
Message-Id: <20020827211008.Y6871-100000@moon.campus.luth.se>
|
|
MIME-Version: 1.0
|
|
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
|
|
X-Pyzor: Reported 0 times.
|
|
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.1 required=7.0
|
|
tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,SIGNATURE_SHORT_SPARSE,
|
|
SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
|
|
version=2.40-cvs
|
|
X-Spam-Level:
|
|
|
|
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 the voices made Jason R. Mastaler write:
|
|
|
|
> jm@jmason.org (Justin Mason) writes:
|
|
>
|
|
> > Sounds a lot like TMDA to me. :( Filing date is July 26, 2001,
|
|
> > granted May 16, 2002.
|
|
> >
|
|
> > TMDAers, have you seen this before?
|
|
>
|
|
> No, but thanks for pointing it out.
|
|
>
|
|
> > I'd presume TMDA is prior art, but still, it could be troublesome...
|
|
>
|
|
> Yup. TMDA's core functionality was fully established before even the
|
|
> filing date.
|
|
>
|
|
> Anyone with experience in this area have a recommendation on whether
|
|
> this should be pursued or not?
|
|
|
|
If you think you can survive it, please fight... When I found that patent I
|
|
found others that were just common sense, things that any geek could implement
|
|
with his script/shell-language of choice; and it's time for someone to get the
|
|
medias attention on what's going on.
|
|
Basically this is the new wave of "namenappers"; it used to be domainnames,
|
|
not it's all the basic general ideas they can think off/find on the web that
|
|
they're patenting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
/Tony
|
|
--
|
|
# Per scientiam ad libertatem! // Through knowledge towards freedom! #
|
|
# Genom kunskap mot frihet! =*= (c) 1999-2002 tony@svanstrom.com =*= #
|
|
|
|
perl -e'print$_{$_} for sort%_=`lynx -dump svanstrom.com/t`'
|
|
|
|
|