192 lines
7.7 KiB
Plaintext
192 lines
7.7 KiB
Plaintext
From exmh-users-admin@redhat.com Tue Sep 3 14:20:18 2002
|
|
Return-Path: <exmh-users-admin@example.com>
|
|
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
|
|
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1])
|
|
by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB0A216F40
|
|
for <jm@localhost>; Tue, 3 Sep 2002 14:18:48 +0100 (IST)
|
|
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
|
|
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
|
|
for jm@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 03 Sep 2002 14:18:48 +0100 (IST)
|
|
Received: from listman.example.com (listman.example.com [66.187.233.211]) by
|
|
dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8322hZ01052 for
|
|
<jm-exmh@jmason.org>; Tue, 3 Sep 2002 03:02:44 +0100
|
|
Received: from listman.example.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
|
|
listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31DB93F4F6; Mon, 2 Sep 2002
|
|
22:03:01 -0400 (EDT)
|
|
Delivered-To: exmh-users@listman.example.com
|
|
Received: from int-mx1.corp.example.com (int-mx1.corp.example.com
|
|
[172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1C093FFC4
|
|
for <exmh-users@listman.redhat.com>; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 22:02:07 -0400 (EDT)
|
|
Received: (from mail@localhost) by int-mx1.corp.example.com (8.11.6/8.11.6)
|
|
id g83223J31599 for exmh-users@listman.redhat.com; Mon, 2 Sep 2002
|
|
22:02:03 -0400
|
|
Received: from mx1.example.com (mx1.example.com [172.16.48.31]) by
|
|
int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g83223Y31570 for
|
|
<exmh-users@redhat.com>; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 22:02:03 -0400
|
|
Received: from blackcomb.panasas.com (gw2.panasas.com [65.194.124.178]) by
|
|
mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g831kQl32226 for
|
|
<exmh-users@redhat.com>; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 21:46:26 -0400
|
|
Received: from medlicott.panasas.com (IDENT:welch@medlicott.panasas.com
|
|
[172.17.132.188]) by blackcomb.panasas.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id
|
|
WAA01468; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 22:01:50 -0400
|
|
Message-Id: <200209030201.WAA01468@blackcomb.panasas.com>
|
|
To: Reg Clemens <reg@dwf.com>
|
|
Cc: exmh-users@example.com
|
|
Subject: Re: ARRRGHHH Had GPG working, now it doesnt.
|
|
In-Reply-To: <200209021953.g82Jrerq003365@orion.dwf.com>
|
|
References: <200209021953.g82Jrerq003365@orion.dwf.com>
|
|
Comments: In-reply-to Reg Clemens <reg@dwf.com> message dated "Mon, 02 Sep
|
|
2002 13:53:40 -0600."
|
|
From: Brent Welch <welch@panasas.com>
|
|
X-Url: http://www.panasas.com/
|
|
X-Face: "HxE|?EnC9fVMV8f70H83&{fgLE.|FZ^$>@Q(yb#N,Eh~N]e&]=>r5~UnRml1:4EglY{9B+
|
|
:'wJq$@c_C!l8@<$t,{YUr4K,QJGHSvS~U]H`<+L*x?eGzSk>XH\W:AK\j?@?c1o<k;j'Ei/UL)!*0
|
|
ILwSR)J\bc)gjz!rrGQ2#i*f:M:ydhK}jp4dWQW?;0{,#iWrCV$4~%e/3)$1/D
|
|
X-Loop: exmh-users@example.com
|
|
Sender: exmh-users-admin@example.com
|
|
Errors-To: exmh-users-admin@example.com
|
|
X-Beenthere: exmh-users@example.com
|
|
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1
|
|
Precedence: bulk
|
|
Reply-To: exmh-users@example.com
|
|
List-Help: <mailto:exmh-users-request@example.com?subject=help>
|
|
List-Post: <mailto:exmh-users@example.com>
|
|
List-Subscribe: <https://listman.example.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users>,
|
|
<mailto:exmh-users-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
|
|
List-Id: Discussion list for EXMH users <exmh-users.example.com>
|
|
List-Unsubscribe: <https://listman.example.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users>,
|
|
<mailto:exmh-users-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
|
|
List-Archive: <https://listman.example.com/mailman/private/exmh-users/>
|
|
Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2002 19:01:49 -0700
|
|
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.3 required=7.0
|
|
tests=AWL,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,REFERENCES,
|
|
SPAM_PHRASE_02_03,X_LOOP
|
|
version=2.41-cvs
|
|
X-Spam-Level:
|
|
|
|
2 things - first, the switch parser changed in a subtle way with 8.4 -
|
|
byte-code compilation was added, and it is slightly more strict in
|
|
its parsing than the original parser. You can only have a comment where
|
|
Tcl would expect to find a command. Switch has a "pattern - body"
|
|
strucutre, so if you goof and put a comment where it is trying to find
|
|
a pattern, both of you will be confused with the results. The
|
|
subtlty arises with extra whitespace and newlines. I can't give you
|
|
the exact case, but I know exmh had one example that stopped parsing
|
|
correctly, and was arguably wrong before.
|
|
|
|
2nd - I've managed to remain fairly ignoranat of the PGP support in
|
|
exmh, so you'll have to dig in yourself or see if someone else on
|
|
exmh-users or exmh-workers is having similar problems.
|
|
|
|
>>>Reg Clemens said:
|
|
> > If you haven't already, you should enable the debug log under
|
|
> > Hacking Support preferences and look for clues there.
|
|
> >
|
|
> > >>>Reg Clemens said:
|
|
> > > > Hi,
|
|
> > > >
|
|
> > > > On Sun, 01 Sep 2002 00:05:03 MDT Reg Clemens wrote:
|
|
> > > >
|
|
> > > > [...]
|
|
> > > > > in messages with GnuPG signatures. But punching the line ALWAYS
|
|
> > > > > gives
|
|
> > > > >
|
|
> > > > > Signature made Thu Aug 29 00:27:17 2002 MDT using DSA key I
|
|
D BDD
|
|
> > F997A
|
|
> > > > > Can't check signature: public key not found
|
|
> > > > >
|
|
> > > > > So, something else is missing.
|
|
> > > >
|
|
> > > > Yes, the public key of the signature you want to check :-).
|
|
> > > >
|
|
> > > > Are you really sure that you have the public key of the message's
|
|
> > > > signature? If not, try downloading it or try to check a signature fro
|
|
m
|
|
> > > > which you know you have the public key.
|
|
> > > >
|
|
> > > >
|
|
> > > >
|
|
> > >
|
|
> > > Ah, sorry for not making that clearer.
|
|
> > > But no.
|
|
> > > Previously (v1.0.6 of GnuPG) there would be a slight pause at this poin
|
|
t whi
|
|
> > le
|
|
> > > it went out to get the public key from a keyserver.
|
|
> > > Now, whether I have the key or NOT, I get the failure message.
|
|
> > >
|
|
> > > Its as if it cant find gpg to execute it (but I fixed that path), so th
|
|
ere
|
|
> > > must be something else that I am missing...
|
|
> > >
|
|
> > >
|
|
> > > --
|
|
> > > Reg.Clemens
|
|
> > > reg@dwf.com
|
|
> > >
|
|
> > >
|
|
> > >
|
|
> > >
|
|
> > > _______________________________________________
|
|
> > > Exmh-users mailing list
|
|
> > > Exmh-users@redhat.com
|
|
> > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users
|
|
> >
|
|
> > --
|
|
> > Brent Welch
|
|
> > Software Architect, Panasas Inc
|
|
> > Pioneering the World's Most Scalable and Agile Storage Network
|
|
> > www.panasas.com
|
|
> > welch@panasas.com
|
|
> >
|
|
>
|
|
>
|
|
> Partial solution.
|
|
> And this MAY be related to using tcl/tk 8.4b1, as I had a similar
|
|
> problem about a month ago elsewhere in EXMH (which you found).
|
|
>
|
|
> But first.
|
|
> I really feel like something has changed out from under me
|
|
> with my making no changes to EXMH. Namely, when I first got
|
|
> GPG up and working (for reading signatures) all I did was
|
|
> touch the 'Check Signature' button' and it went out and queried
|
|
> the keyserver for me.
|
|
> Now Im getting a separate box, after the failure to find the
|
|
> public key on my keyring, asking me of I want to 'Query keyserver'
|
|
>
|
|
> I KNOW that I never had to touch a 'Query keyserver' button in
|
|
> the past, but there it is now, and I havent touched EXMH. Spooky.
|
|
>
|
|
> I have been working back and forth between GPG 1.0.6 and 1.0.7
|
|
> but its not clear how that could be the problem, as Im now getting
|
|
> the 'Query' message when running either...
|
|
>
|
|
> ---
|
|
>
|
|
> OK, enough about my confusion.
|
|
> The CURRENT problem seems to be a COMMENT in a SWITCH statement
|
|
> at line 86 in pgpWWW.tcl. Tcl 8.4b1 doesnt like it and I get your
|
|
> popup box. Remove it and no popupbox, but EXMH hangs (sigh).
|
|
> So, not a complete solution, but at least a start.
|
|
>
|
|
> Thanks for the interest.
|
|
>
|
|
> Reg.Clemens
|
|
> reg@dwf.com
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Brent Welch
|
|
Software Architect, Panasas Inc
|
|
Pioneering the World's Most Scalable and Agile Storage Network
|
|
www.panasas.com
|
|
welch@panasas.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_______________________________________________
|
|
Exmh-users mailing list
|
|
Exmh-users@redhat.com
|
|
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users
|
|
|