99 lines
4.3 KiB
Plaintext
99 lines
4.3 KiB
Plaintext
From exmh-workers-admin@redhat.com Mon Aug 26 23:40:32 2002
|
|
Return-Path: <exmh-workers-admin@example.com>
|
|
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.netnoteinc.com
|
|
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
|
|
by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37BB744156
|
|
for <jm@localhost>; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 18:40:29 -0400 (EDT)
|
|
Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1]
|
|
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
|
|
for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 26 Aug 2002 23:40:29 +0100 (IST)
|
|
Received: from listman.example.com (listman.example.com [66.187.233.211]) by
|
|
dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7QMdsZ12703 for
|
|
<jm-exmh@jmason.org>; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 23:39:55 +0100
|
|
Received: from listman.example.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
|
|
listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C29093F9B1; Mon, 26 Aug 2002
|
|
18:40:02 -0400 (EDT)
|
|
Delivered-To: exmh-workers@listman.example.com
|
|
Received: from int-mx1.corp.example.com (int-mx1.corp.example.com
|
|
[172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABEFB3F553
|
|
for <exmh-workers@listman.redhat.com>; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 18:38:20 -0400
|
|
(EDT)
|
|
Received: (from mail@localhost) by int-mx1.corp.example.com (8.11.6/8.11.6)
|
|
id g7QMcHo02036 for exmh-workers@listman.redhat.com; Mon, 26 Aug 2002
|
|
18:38:17 -0400
|
|
Received: from mx1.example.com (mx1.example.com [172.16.48.31]) by
|
|
int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g7QMcHY02032 for
|
|
<exmh-workers@redhat.com>; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 18:38:17 -0400
|
|
Received: from milou.dyndns.org (h189n1fls22o974.telia.com
|
|
[213.64.79.189]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id
|
|
g7QMNMl19536 for <exmh-workers@redhat.com>; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 18:23:22
|
|
-0400
|
|
Received: by milou.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id AB8A13F21;
|
|
Tue, 27 Aug 2002 00:38:10 +0200 (CEST)
|
|
Received: from tippex.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
|
|
milou.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69C793F20; Tue, 27 Aug 2002
|
|
00:38:10 +0200 (CEST)
|
|
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5_20020826 01/15/2001 with nmh-1.0.4
|
|
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
|
|
Cc: exmh-workers@example.com
|
|
Subject: Re: Exmh && speed
|
|
In-Reply-To: Message from Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu of
|
|
"Mon, 26 Aug 2002 14:22:46 EDT."
|
|
<200208261822.g7QIMk7P005756@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
|
|
MIME-Version: 1.0
|
|
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
|
|
From: Anders Eriksson <aeriksson@fastmail.fm>
|
|
Message-Id: <20020826223810.AB8A13F21@milou.dyndns.org>
|
|
X-Loop: exmh-workers@example.com
|
|
Sender: exmh-workers-admin@example.com
|
|
Errors-To: exmh-workers-admin@example.com
|
|
X-Beenthere: exmh-workers@example.com
|
|
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1
|
|
Precedence: bulk
|
|
List-Help: <mailto:exmh-workers-request@example.com?subject=help>
|
|
List-Post: <mailto:exmh-workers@example.com>
|
|
List-Subscribe: <https://listman.example.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers>,
|
|
<mailto:exmh-workers-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
|
|
List-Id: Discussion list for EXMH developers <exmh-workers.example.com>
|
|
List-Unsubscribe: <https://listman.example.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers>,
|
|
<mailto:exmh-workers-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
|
|
List-Archive: <https://listman.example.com/mailman/private/exmh-workers/>
|
|
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 00:38:05 +0200
|
|
X-Pyzor: Reported 0 times.
|
|
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.1 required=7.0
|
|
tests=IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
|
|
SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,X_LOOP
|
|
version=2.40-cvs
|
|
X-Spam-Level:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu said:
|
|
> I checked on a number of small messages in a big folder (~10000
|
|
> msgs). The delay of the Next button has increased considerably:
|
|
>
|
|
> 2.5-release: 350-450 msec
|
|
> latest cvs: 1000-12000 msec
|
|
> I'm not seeing a hit on 'next'. A quick "just pound on 'next' and
|
|
> watch the wall clock" test shows me able to go through 20 messages in
|
|
> under 5 seconds, so it's well under 250ms per switch, but I'm seeing a
|
|
> really piggy CPU spike (100% for a few seconds) in the 'flist' code.
|
|
> Of course, it seems to be related to number-of-folders:
|
|
|
|
> [~] wc Mail/.folders
|
|
> 131 131 1122 Mail/.folders
|
|
|
|
I have 167 folders (!) and run with bg-proc set to flist (1 minute).
|
|
I see delays, but not that much. Maybe 1-3 seconds (which tend to
|
|
disappear these days). This is on a PII-266.
|
|
|
|
BR,
|
|
/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_______________________________________________
|
|
Exmh-workers mailing list
|
|
Exmh-workers@redhat.com
|
|
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers
|
|
|