324 lines
11 KiB
Plaintext
324 lines
11 KiB
Plaintext
From fork-admin@xent.com Thu Sep 19 11:05:30 2002
|
|
Return-Path: <fork-admin@xent.com>
|
|
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
|
|
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
|
|
by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CF0F16F03
|
|
for <jm@localhost>; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 11:05:28 +0100 (IST)
|
|
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
|
|
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
|
|
for jm@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 19 Sep 2002 11:05:28 +0100 (IST)
|
|
Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
|
|
(8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8J3eiC03141 for <jm@jmason.org>;
|
|
Thu, 19 Sep 2002 04:40:45 +0100
|
|
Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
|
|
with ESMTP id D81B92940FA; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 20:37:05 -0700 (PDT)
|
|
Delivered-To: fork@example.com
|
|
Received: from hotmail.com (dav37.law15.hotmail.com [64.4.22.94]) by
|
|
xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D033729409E for <fork@xent.com>;
|
|
Wed, 18 Sep 2002 20:36:12 -0700 (PDT)
|
|
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
|
|
Wed, 18 Sep 2002 20:39:35 -0700
|
|
X-Originating-Ip: [207.202.171.254]
|
|
From: "Mr. FoRK" <fork_list@hotmail.com>
|
|
To: <fork@example.com>
|
|
Subject: Oh ma gawd - funny site of the day...
|
|
MIME-Version: 1.0
|
|
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
|
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
|
|
X-Priority: 3
|
|
X-Msmail-Priority: Normal
|
|
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
|
|
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
|
|
Message-Id: <DAV37u72CQUe91PBX44000116fb@hotmail.com>
|
|
X-Originalarrivaltime: 19 Sep 2002 03:39:35.0500 (UTC) FILETIME=[2C6B00C0:01C25F8E]
|
|
Sender: fork-admin@xent.com
|
|
Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com
|
|
X-Beenthere: fork@example.com
|
|
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
|
|
Precedence: bulk
|
|
List-Help: <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=help>
|
|
List-Post: <mailto:fork@example.com>
|
|
List-Subscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>, <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=subscribe>
|
|
List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare <fork.xent.com>
|
|
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>,
|
|
<mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=unsubscribe>
|
|
List-Archive: <http://xent.com/pipermail/fork/>
|
|
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 20:44:08 -0700
|
|
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.2 required=7.0
|
|
tests=AWL,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST
|
|
version=2.50-cvs
|
|
X-Spam-Level:
|
|
|
|
This is for those that have interacted with D Winer
|
|
|
|
"Dave's idea of love is fucking everyone else without so much as a reach
|
|
around. You're supposed to just shut up and take it."
|
|
|
|
http://winerlog.inspiredsites.net/
|
|
|
|
===========
|
|
|
|
Who's the real monster?
|
|
|
|
|
|
It seems good Ol' Uncle Dave is once again trying to savage anyone that
|
|
dares to disagree with him. It seems Ben, Kevin and Bill are making too
|
|
strong a case. So here we Dave's attempt to fool you into thinking they're
|
|
some sort of monsters, violent ones no less.
|
|
|
|
Anyone who works with Hemenway or Kearney should be aware that these people
|
|
are nothing less than monsters, who will stoop to any level to get their
|
|
way.
|
|
|
|
Yeah sure Dave, whatever you need to believe.
|
|
|
|
The truth is these folks do a fine job of actually helping others and
|
|
improving RSS in general. Each with their own brand of attitude, to be
|
|
sure, but they seem to be pretty focused on actually helping things move
|
|
forward. How is that being monstrous?
|
|
|
|
Is Dave trying to slander their good names and thus poison the public's
|
|
perception of them? If you haven't already, contact them and ask them how
|
|
they feel about this foolishness.
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/18/02; 10:07:38 AM - Discuss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dave deflects what he can't take the time to understand
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's really quite pitiful. When normal people don't understand something
|
|
they usually try learning about it. They read up, ask questions and seek
|
|
the help of those that understand it. This before shooting their mouths off
|
|
and looking like fools.
|
|
|
|
What Dave does is just the opposite.
|
|
|
|
Posts a link to something he doesn't understand
|
|
Get's a bunch of e-mail from people who do understand it
|
|
Derides the idea as being 'too much trouble' and blogs it.
|
|
Expects others to do research for him
|
|
Abuses anyone who tries to help him
|
|
Pontificates, incorrectly, about only part of the issue
|
|
Realizes he's been a fool but refuses to correct himself
|
|
Plods forward pedantically trying to defend his idiocy
|
|
Tries making the educated people look like fools.
|
|
Sends private e-mails to them trying to scare them off.
|
|
Exposes any private e-mail they write, out of context.
|
|
Deflects and runs off to some new topic, repeats from #1
|
|
His continued diatribes about RSS-1.0 and it's use of RDF reveal this to be
|
|
true. Dave doesn't get the idea of the semantic web. He'd rather have you
|
|
follow his stupid ideas than dare admit that the work of others is worth
|
|
trying.
|
|
|
|
One reader wrote to us with a good analogy. "It's like that movie The
|
|
Poseidon Adventure. Dave's like the purser ranting and raving that the
|
|
passengers should follow him and march toward the bow. I don't know about
|
|
you but I'd rather be with the fat lady swimming toward the engine room.
|
|
The ship's fucking sinking and I don't want to be following the idiot."
|
|
|
|
Dave's idea of love is fucking everyone else without so much as a reach
|
|
around. You're supposed to just shut up and take it. After all, why would
|
|
good ol' Uncle Dave want to hurt you? It's all about love, right? To hell
|
|
with asking you if you want to get shafted. And if you dare complain, he
|
|
savages you. Then he tries to make everyone think you're the one causing
|
|
all the trouble.
|
|
|
|
We've news for you Dave, we're wise to your tactics and we're talking
|
|
amongst ourselves about it. We're routing around you damaging behavoir.
|
|
That's where we're coming from.
|
|
|
|
If you have an example of how you've tried to help Dave, please drop us an
|
|
e-mail about it. We'll keep it strictly confidential of course. Send it
|
|
along to zaphod@egroups.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/12/02; 10:13:11 AM - Discuss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trying to talk with Dave is like trying to wrestle a pig...
|
|
|
|
|
|
The trouble is, you get dirty and the pig seems to like it.
|
|
|
|
Another developer tries talking to Dave and discovers it's fundamentally
|
|
impossible:
|
|
|
|
His basic response was just that RDF was a joke and the Semantic Web
|
|
developers are doing a terrible job.
|
|
|
|
In the span of less than five minutes Dave makes such an ass of himself that
|
|
people at other tables start whispering "that guy is an idiot..."
|
|
|
|
The zaphodim, however, are veteran pig wrestlers. If you've got a similar
|
|
tale from the mud pit, be sure to drop us a line at: zaphod@egroups.com.
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/11/02; 2:17:58 PM - Discuss (1 response)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aha! Some backing down by the whining one?
|
|
|
|
|
|
It would appear the 'dictator release' strategy that Dave's been trying on
|
|
his crappy little set of RSS hacks is failing to gain support.
|
|
|
|
I'm going to push back the caveat-removing on the 2.0 spec by 24 hours.
|
|
Still have work to do on the sample file, I want to look into the RFC for
|
|
time-date specs, and get started on the Radio implementation of 2.0. I have
|
|
to prepare for Seybold tomorrow, and I want to a little memorial for 9-11. A
|
|
busy few days for a guy still recovering. Also, it would be great if people
|
|
who make content tools could review the 2.0 spec and see if there are any
|
|
deal-stoppers.
|
|
|
|
Hell yeah there are deal stoppers, like nobody wants it nor will they use
|
|
it!
|
|
|
|
The poor Radio customers! The poor Salon blog users! They're going to be
|
|
dragged unwillingly into producing XML content that nobody will use! So
|
|
with the flip of his mighty upgrade switch Dave is going to turn all their
|
|
content into totally unsupported garbage!!!
|
|
|
|
Ya better speak up now folks otherwise your content is going to start
|
|
getting rejected!
|
|
|
|
Of course at the same time Dave tries to play the sympathy card. What utter
|
|
fucking nonsense. This past weekend, the blogosphere excoriates him for his
|
|
'blame America' bullshit. Then the RSS community tells him to get stuffed
|
|
with his dictator release of RSS. Now he's trying to pretend we should be
|
|
nice to him because he's still recovering?
|
|
|
|
Uh, Dave, if you want to take a rest from the battle then stop picking
|
|
fights. We'll still kick your ass regardless. That's what years of your
|
|
abusing people has gotten you Dave. No sympathy anymore, none whatsoever.
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/11/02; 1:56:10 PM - Discuss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dave is Scary on 9/11
|
|
|
|
Posted on Scripting News on 9/10/2002:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: During the day tomorrow there will be no updates to Scripting News.
|
|
I'll be in SF at Seybold, leading a discussion on Web Services for
|
|
Publishing with people from Amazon, Apple, Google and Jake Savin of
|
|
UserLand. I may be able to update my Radio weblog, but only if there's
|
|
something really important to report. So best wishes for a happy and safe
|
|
9-11.
|
|
What kind of asshole wishes people a happy 9/11??!?!?!?!??!! Obviously
|
|
someone who doesn't have a clue nor lost anyone in the tragedy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/11/02; 7:56:06 AM - Discuss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yeow and we though we were harsh!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wow, apparently Dave's sticking his neck out quite far these days. Craig
|
|
Schamp practically keel-hauls him with this one. He wraps it up with:
|
|
|
|
The man seems to show over and over that he's nothing more than a whining
|
|
buffoon
|
|
|
|
Give that man an honorary Zaphodim membership card and secret decoder ring!
|
|
|
|
Related links over at PhotoDude, Richard Bennett, Andrea Harris, Reid Stott,
|
|
Jeff Jarvis, Ipse Dixit, and the Fat Guy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/9/02; 12:29:45 PM - Discuss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RSS 2.0: code name "Hitler"
|
|
|
|
|
|
If Dave tries to steamroll RSS 2.0 through without formal community
|
|
consensus, here now we call it the "Hitler" release of 2.0.
|
|
|
|
"No objections"? No, he means "No objections I choose to hear."
|
|
|
|
Dave is simply not listening. People are objecting all over.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/6/02; 9:00:02 AM - Discuss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Referral log funnies
|
|
|
|
|
|
Every now and then we check the referral logs to see what's pointing back to
|
|
us. We sincerely apologize to the pool soul that used this search.
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/5/02; 12:15:07 PM - Discuss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Luserland Attempts to Trademark "RSS"
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dave has waxed and waned about intellectual property rights and how any
|
|
BigCo that tries to patent its technology or methods is corrupt or morally
|
|
bankrupt. Scripting News is full of examples.
|
|
|
|
So we found it surprising, as did many others, when Luserland software tried
|
|
to patent the term 'RSS' back in 2000. Here's the patent application:
|
|
|
|
http://tarr.uspto.gov/servlet/tarr?regser=serial&entry=78025336
|
|
|
|
This was apparently just between the start of the RSS 1.0 development
|
|
efforts, and the publication of the specification. Winer knew about the RSS
|
|
1.0 stuff - indeed, he complained about it bitterly at the time.
|
|
|
|
Could Dave be any more transparent?!?!??!?!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Since when has Dave been required to follow anything he says he wants others
|
|
to do??? A good quote from before he filed the patent application:
|
|
|
|
Tim O'Reilly says patents are OK, he's just against stupid patents. In the
|
|
spirit of Touch of Grey, Tim man, patents are lock-in of the worst kind.
|
|
There's no way to route around them.
|
|
|
|
9/4/02; 6:06:51 AM - Discuss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When's a Permalink not a Permalink?
|
|
|
|
|
|
When Dave writes an item, then removes it!!!!!!!!!!! The permalink links to
|
|
nothing at that point. So apparently the "perma-" part in permalink is
|
|
permanent. For everyone except Dave. Too bad his little attempt at a
|
|
definition fails to mention this...!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/2/02; 6:16:03 PM - Discuss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|