101 lines
4.8 KiB
Plaintext
101 lines
4.8 KiB
Plaintext
From fork-admin@xent.com Thu Sep 12 13:39:41 2002
|
|
Return-Path: <fork-admin@xent.com>
|
|
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
|
|
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
|
|
by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 686C716F03
|
|
for <jm@localhost>; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 13:39:40 +0100 (IST)
|
|
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
|
|
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
|
|
for jm@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 12 Sep 2002 13:39:40 +0100 (IST)
|
|
Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
|
|
(8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8C0KdC09588 for <jm@jmason.org>;
|
|
Thu, 12 Sep 2002 01:20:42 +0100
|
|
Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
|
|
with ESMTP id 782582940AE; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 17:17:04 -0700 (PDT)
|
|
Delivered-To: fork@example.com
|
|
Received: from crank.slack.net (slack.net [166.84.151.181]) by xent.com
|
|
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A5A429409A for <fork@xent.com>; Wed,
|
|
11 Sep 2002 17:16:05 -0700 (PDT)
|
|
Received: by crank.slack.net (Postfix, from userid 596) id 935633ED61;
|
|
Wed, 11 Sep 2002 20:22:18 -0400 (EDT)
|
|
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by crank.slack.net
|
|
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 91B813ECF4 for <fork@xent.com>; Wed,
|
|
11 Sep 2002 20:22:18 -0400 (EDT)
|
|
From: Tom <tomwhore@slack.net>
|
|
To: fork@example.com
|
|
Subject: Since we were on the subject...
|
|
Message-Id: <Pine.BSO.4.44.0209112004410.23272-100000@crank.slack.net>
|
|
MIME-Version: 1.0
|
|
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
|
|
Sender: fork-admin@xent.com
|
|
Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com
|
|
X-Beenthere: fork@example.com
|
|
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
|
|
Precedence: bulk
|
|
List-Help: <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=help>
|
|
List-Post: <mailto:fork@example.com>
|
|
List-Subscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>, <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=subscribe>
|
|
List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare <fork.xent.com>
|
|
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>,
|
|
<mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=unsubscribe>
|
|
List-Archive: <http://xent.com/pipermail/fork/>
|
|
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 20:22:18 -0400 (EDT)
|
|
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.6 required=7.0
|
|
tests=AWL,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT_PINE
|
|
version=2.50-cvs
|
|
X-Spam-Level:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gays, gay sex, gay marriage.....wooohooo its been a mano e mano week and
|
|
thursady will be the mass market consumer period on it.
|
|
|
|
The WWE's gay marriage cermemony is in the can, that is its been filmed
|
|
last night for thursady nights Smackdown. Did they do it tastefully? Oh
|
|
come on its the WWE for cripssake, of course they didnt. Did they use it
|
|
ot promote an story line? Despite the WWE throwing away more good story
|
|
lines in the last 2 years than a wood chuck who could chuck wood if the
|
|
enviromentalists did not slap lawsuits on them, the sotrywrites seemed to
|
|
have finaly hit on a big tie togther event for several story lines.
|
|
|
|
But of course, no one here watches the WWE, and not even because you would
|
|
rather watch old Divxs of the ECW, so this little bit is probably fallign
|
|
on the old killsawfiles.
|
|
|
|
SO I wont be bursting anyones thursdaynight plans if I smarkout and say
|
|
that B and C waver near the final vows, the blame is falling on Ricco,
|
|
thier "manager"*, for pushing them to carry out their "gay" act far too
|
|
long and just when things look to be heating up with that story
|
|
arc......the mask comes off the justice of the piece as he pronounces
|
|
that they have gone 3 minutes, yes 3 minutes, too long.....Yep, its the
|
|
Bisch and in come Rosey and Jamal to attempt a stomping on Stpehnie
|
|
McMahon. Hopefully they did not get off a kick like they did on the first
|
|
lesbain back on Mondays raw as that broke a rib.
|
|
|
|
Of course the editing truck boys might change some none or all of this
|
|
around, so if thursday nights tape play reveals them hitch and on thier
|
|
way to a honeymoon, thats the luck o the smarkies. I doubt it will be
|
|
edited much though from the way I heard it.
|
|
|
|
So the bottomline is, they really were not gay all along, they were play
|
|
acting and it got out of hand because Ricco made them, Steaphnie gets a
|
|
face push while the Bisch gets a thursady night special 3 min heel push,
|
|
thus furthing the story arc of the brand split. Rosey and Jamala get heat
|
|
and B and C get a new Tag Team to play with. Ricco..who knows, maybe some
|
|
heat time would be good for him as a single.
|
|
|
|
All this of course at a time when the ratting are in the bottom of a 4
|
|
year valley of gloom, the last 2 years have been mostly squandered on
|
|
borken story arc promises and bad acting, and to top it all off Mick is no
|
|
longer ont he sceen so...bang bang...how can it be all good?
|
|
|
|
Well, its back to my growing ECW divx collection where Tajiri was the shiz
|
|
and Mick cut promos unrivaled by any of todays mic monkeys.
|
|
|
|
* Todays managers are a far cry form the managers of the 80's/early 90's.
|
|
Ricco is nota Paul Bearer or a Jimmy Heart at all but more like a buddy
|
|
who goes to the ring with them and occasional interferes..ugh.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|