StanfordMLOctave/machine-learning-ex6/ex6/easy_ham/0390.d1ecb44eef90f33245ee08...

53 lines
2.2 KiB
Plaintext

From fork-admin@xent.com Tue Aug 27 00:53:25 2002
Return-Path: <fork-admin@xent.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.netnoteinc.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0480643F99
for <jm@localhost>; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 19:53:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1]
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
for jm@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 27 Aug 2002 00:53:25 +0100 (IST)
Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
(8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7QNnfZ15088 for <jm@jmason.org>;
Tue, 27 Aug 2002 00:49:42 +0100
Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 4CF8F2941C9; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 16:47:09 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: fork@example.com
Received: from argote.ch (argote.ch [80.65.224.17]) by xent.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 4F1B129417F for <fork@xent.com>; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 16:46:53
-0700 (PDT)
Received: by argote.ch (Postfix, from userid 500) id 4DAC7C44D;
Tue, 27 Aug 2002 01:40:02 +0200 (CEST)
To: fork@example.com
Subject: Re: A biblical digression
Message-Id: <20020826234002.4DAC7C44D@argote.ch>
From: harley@argote.ch (Robert Harley)
Sender: fork-admin@xent.com
Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com
X-Beenthere: fork@example.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:fork@example.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>, <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare <fork.xent.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>,
<mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://xent.com/pipermail/fork/>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 01:40:02 +0200 (CEST)
X-Pyzor: Reported 0 times.
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=7.0
tests=KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.40-cvs
X-Spam-Level:
John Hall:
>Ran across a site which claimed to explain the original meaning of the
>Ten Commandments. It seems some of those meanings have evolved a bit, too.
You mean that "Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's ass" used to be
about donkeys??? Inconceivable!!!
R