77 lines
3.1 KiB
Plaintext
77 lines
3.1 KiB
Plaintext
From fork-admin@xent.com Mon Aug 26 22:18:19 2002
|
|
Return-Path: <fork-admin@xent.com>
|
|
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.netnoteinc.com
|
|
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
|
|
by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6106E43F9B
|
|
for <jm@localhost>; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 17:18:19 -0400 (EDT)
|
|
Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1]
|
|
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
|
|
for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 26 Aug 2002 22:18:19 +0100 (IST)
|
|
Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
|
|
(8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7QLIPZ10013 for <jm@jmason.org>;
|
|
Mon, 26 Aug 2002 22:18:25 +0100
|
|
Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
|
|
with ESMTP id 9F9792941DA; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 13:39:14 -0700 (PDT)
|
|
Delivered-To: fork@example.com
|
|
Received: from tux.w3.org (tux.w3.org [18.29.0.27]) by xent.com (Postfix)
|
|
with ESMTP id 16C54294099 for <fork@xent.com>; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 16:38:02
|
|
-0700 (PDT)
|
|
Received: from localhost (danbri@localhost) by tux.w3.org (8.9.3/8.9.3)
|
|
with ESMTP id TAA12658; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 19:39:45 -0400
|
|
From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
|
|
To: Lucas Gonze <lgonze@panix.com>
|
|
Cc: "Fork@Xent.Com" <fork@example.com>
|
|
Subject: Re: The case for spam
|
|
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0208221910560.17440-100000@localhost.localdomain>
|
|
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0208221935220.31207-100000@tux.w3.org>
|
|
MIME-Version: 1.0
|
|
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
|
|
Sender: fork-admin@xent.com
|
|
Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com
|
|
X-Beenthere: fork@example.com
|
|
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
|
|
Precedence: bulk
|
|
List-Help: <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=help>
|
|
List-Post: <mailto:fork@example.com>
|
|
List-Subscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>, <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=subscribe>
|
|
List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare <fork.xent.com>
|
|
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>,
|
|
<mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=unsubscribe>
|
|
List-Archive: <http://xent.com/pipermail/fork/>
|
|
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 19:39:45 -0400 (EDT)
|
|
X-Pyzor: Reported 0 times.
|
|
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=7.0
|
|
tests=DATE_IN_PAST_48_96,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,
|
|
KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,
|
|
USER_AGENT_PINE
|
|
version=2.40-cvs
|
|
X-Spam-Level:
|
|
|
|
On Thu, 22 Aug 2002, Lucas Gonze wrote:
|
|
|
|
>
|
|
> Political mail (the snail kind) doesn't bother me. I like it a lot of the
|
|
> time, because as crap as it is at least it's not the kind of info you get
|
|
> on TV. Particularly for small time local politics, it's the best way to
|
|
> get information.
|
|
|
|
Except that thanks to the magic of spam, it's usually some else's locale
|
|
|
|
> but what matters is that mail is speech, and political email has to be as
|
|
> well protected as any other political speech. Spam is *the* tool for
|
|
> dissident news, since the face that it's unsolicited means that recipients
|
|
> can't be blamed for being on a mailing list.
|
|
|
|
A terrible argument. There are better technical solutions to privacy
|
|
protection than sending a copy of the same message to everyone on the
|
|
Internet, so the recipients can't be blamed for reading it.
|
|
|
|
Wait till phone spam is as cheap to send as email spam...
|
|
|
|
Dan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork
|
|
|