67 lines
3.6 KiB
Plaintext
67 lines
3.6 KiB
Plaintext
From rssfeeds@jmason.org Thu Sep 26 16:33:47 2002
|
|
Return-Path: <rssfeeds@example.com>
|
|
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
|
|
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
|
|
by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4D9216F03
|
|
for <jm@localhost>; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 16:33:45 +0100 (IST)
|
|
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
|
|
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
|
|
for jm@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 26 Sep 2002 16:33:45 +0100 (IST)
|
|
Received: from dogma.slashnull.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
|
|
dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8QFRfg24223 for
|
|
<jm@jmason.org>; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 16:27:41 +0100
|
|
Message-Id: <200209261527.g8QFRfg24223@dogma.slashnull.org>
|
|
To: yyyy@example.com
|
|
From: "hyatt@mozilla" <rssfeeds@example.com>
|
|
Subject: A Line in the Sand
|
|
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 15:27:41 -0000
|
|
Content-Type: text/plain; encoding=utf-8
|
|
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0
|
|
tests=AWL
|
|
version=2.50-cvs
|
|
X-Spam-Level:
|
|
|
|
URL: http://www.mozillazine.org/weblogs/hyatt/#85443841
|
|
Date: Not supplied
|
|
|
|
Bug 22056 has to do with enabling different toolbar modes. It's a pretty basic
|
|
browser feature that has been missing from Navigator for years. Even simplified
|
|
browsers like Chimera have this feature. Neil did some excellent work in 22056
|
|
and his code finally landed. It naturally spiked startup time and window time
|
|
slightly, and so it ended up being backed out because of Mozilla's no tolerance
|
|
policy for regressions.
|
|
|
|
While this "line in the sand" policy is in many ways a good one, I feel like it
|
|
misses the point. There is a natural tendency when designing applications to
|
|
add features in every new version of the software. Only rarely do you see
|
|
features removed. With each passing version, you get more and more bloated,
|
|
relying on faster machines and more memory to save the day. Who cares if the
|
|
user interface is now full of 3000 menu items? You still support every last
|
|
feature since version 1.0, so no customers can possibly be dissatisfied!
|
|
|
|
You can really only cram so many features into a product before its size
|
|
requirements and performance requirements have to change. This is an obvious
|
|
rule. It's like you start with an empty elevator that says "Capacity: 10
|
|
people." The elevator stops at the first floor (version 1.0) and a bunch of
|
|
people (features) get on. Continuing on its journey, the elevator stops at the
|
|
second floor, and still more people get on. The elevator is now full, and it
|
|
continues to the third floor (version 3.0). Unfortunately the elevator is full,
|
|
but there are a bunch of people waiting at the third floor to get on. Some of
|
|
them squeeze in anyway, past the fat person from the first floor (the Mozilla
|
|
sidebar feature) who is taking up enough space for 3 people. Everyone wishes
|
|
he'd get off at the third floor or even the fourth floor, but he doesn't.
|
|
Someone (the Mozilla wallet feature) from the second floor cuts one on the way
|
|
to the third floor, so he's useless, and everyone wishes he'd get off too. He
|
|
doesn't though. Nobody does. People keep piling in at floor after floor, until
|
|
eventually the elevator support cable snaps and everybody dies.
|
|
|
|
We need to forcibly eject people from the elevator. Remove the features that
|
|
nobody wants and replace them with the features that matter. Cull out the
|
|
features that didn't work in Mozilla 1.0 and make sure they aren't there in
|
|
Mozilla 2.0. Make more of the features optional plugins so that geeks who want
|
|
some of the more obscure features (and that have powerhouse machines) can go
|
|
download them on their own. Only if we actively fight the trend towards bloat
|
|
will we finally produce an awesome Mozilla browser.
|
|
|
|
|