130 lines
4.0 KiB
Plaintext
130 lines
4.0 KiB
Plaintext
From rssfeeds@jmason.org Thu Sep 26 16:33:42 2002
|
|
Return-Path: <rssfeeds@example.com>
|
|
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
|
|
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
|
|
by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6FF416F17
|
|
for <jm@localhost>; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 16:33:40 +0100 (IST)
|
|
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
|
|
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
|
|
for jm@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 26 Sep 2002 16:33:40 +0100 (IST)
|
|
Received: from dogma.slashnull.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
|
|
dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8QFReg24218 for
|
|
<jm@jmason.org>; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 16:27:40 +0100
|
|
Message-Id: <200209261527.g8QFReg24218@dogma.slashnull.org>
|
|
To: yyyy@example.com
|
|
From: "hyatt@mozilla" <rssfeeds@example.com>
|
|
Subject: Missing the Point
|
|
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 15:27:40 -0000
|
|
Content-Type: text/plain; encoding=utf-8
|
|
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0
|
|
tests=AWL
|
|
version=2.50-cvs
|
|
X-Spam-Level:
|
|
|
|
URL: http://www.mozillazine.org/weblogs/hyatt/#85471617
|
|
Date: Not supplied
|
|
|
|
A lot of people seem to be missing the point of Phoenix, as evidenced by the
|
|
responses on Mozilla News[1] and MozillaZine[2]. Let me emphasize something
|
|
here: if you think Mozilla's current UI is acceptable, then you are clearly not
|
|
the target audience for Phoenix.
|
|
|
|
Here is a quiz to test whether or not Phoenix is the right browser for you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
- The link toolbar is:
|
|
|
|
|
|
- critical to my day-to-day use
|
|
- vital when using Bugzilla! Doesn't everybody use Bugzilla?
|
|
- link what?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- The sidebar is
|
|
|
|
|
|
- indispensable since i run at 1600x1200 resolution
|
|
- not cool enough, since i can't float and dock all my panels and have
|
|
splitters between all panels and see web page progress for individual HTML
|
|
panels and check my email entirely from within sidebar and...
|
|
- a waste of real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Form auto-fill
|
|
|
|
|
|
- is not useful for me unless I can fill out 20 pages of personal information
|
|
first
|
|
- should just happen automatically
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Downloads
|
|
|
|
|
|
- should take place in a tree view with progress meters in the columns!
|
|
- should be clearly visible and understandable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Toolbars should
|
|
|
|
|
|
- be dockable to all four corners of the screen, be able to float outside the
|
|
window, be fully customizable such that I can make my own custom commands, be
|
|
able to edit existing buttons' commands, be able to create my own toolbars, be
|
|
able to put toolbars on the same line, and be able to edit the submenus and
|
|
context menus of items (including the items on the menu bar) and browse my file
|
|
system and cook me dinner and wash my car and walk my dog and do my taxes and
|
|
mow my lawn and...
|
|
- be customizable within reason
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Composer should
|
|
|
|
|
|
- always come with my browser. I want composer options all over my UI.
|
|
Everywhere!
|
|
- not be part of a Web browser.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Mail should
|
|
|
|
|
|
- be part of my browser program. Aren't they the same app? There is a
|
|
difference?
|
|
- be a separate application.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now to those people who want the full-blown functionality of the Mozilla trunk,
|
|
you can still get that with Phoenix. The idea is to relegate more features to
|
|
the "optional add-on" category. If you want the link toolbar or the sidebar or
|
|
mouse gestures or any other features, you can download and install them
|
|
yourself. I expect Phoenix will have a little add-in manager that will
|
|
facilitate this process. There is currently an expectation on the part of an
|
|
alarming number of people that every feature implemented by anyone should
|
|
automatically be part of the default Mozilla install/download.
|
|
|
|
Why?
|
|
|
|
A layered approach scales better. You can then have a browser that can become
|
|
as complex as you want to make it, but the choice is left in your hands. The
|
|
geek features aren't inflicted on you by default.
|
|
|
|
Finally, remember that Phoenix's UI is not controlled by Netscape. This is an
|
|
opportunity for some of the core Mozilla Navigator developers to build the
|
|
browser that they have always wanted to build, without having to compromise the
|
|
user interface to satisfy the various conflicting pressures exerted by factions
|
|
within Netscape.
|
|
|
|
[1] http://www.mozillanews.org
|
|
[2] http://www.mozillazine.org
|
|
|
|
|