141 lines
6.3 KiB
Plaintext
141 lines
6.3 KiB
Plaintext
From spamassassin-talk-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Fri Sep 13 20:45:28 2002
|
|
Return-Path: <spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net>
|
|
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
|
|
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
|
|
by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E44416F03
|
|
for <jm@localhost>; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 20:45:27 +0100 (IST)
|
|
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
|
|
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
|
|
for jm@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 13 Sep 2002 20:45:27 +0100 (IST)
|
|
Received: from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net
|
|
[216.136.171.252]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
|
|
g8DJ6lC31348 for <jm-sa@jmason.org>; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 20:06:47 +0100
|
|
Received: from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13]
|
|
helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with
|
|
esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17pvjp-0007DC-00; Fri,
|
|
13 Sep 2002 12:04:21 -0700
|
|
Received: from eclectic.kluge.net ([66.92.69.221]) by
|
|
usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
|
|
(Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17pvi8-0001P9-00 for
|
|
<spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net>; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 12:02:36 -0700
|
|
Received: from eclectic.kluge.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
|
|
eclectic.kluge.net (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id g8DJ1I4q022972;
|
|
Fri, 13 Sep 2002 15:01:18 -0400
|
|
Received: (from felicity@localhost) by eclectic.kluge.net
|
|
(8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id g8DJ1I96022970; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 15:01:18 -0400
|
|
From: Theo Van Dinter <felicity@kluge.net>
|
|
To: vernon@comp-wiz.com
|
|
Cc: spamassassin-talk <spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net>
|
|
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] OT: DNS MX Record Clarification Please
|
|
Message-Id: <20020913190117.GG5897@kluge.net>
|
|
References: <20020913151635.M21128@b2unow.com>
|
|
<20020913183343.M49078@b2unow.com>
|
|
MIME-Version: 1.0
|
|
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
|
|
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
|
|
boundary="Fnm8lRGFTVS/3GuM"
|
|
Content-Disposition: inline
|
|
In-Reply-To: <20020913183343.M49078@b2unow.com>
|
|
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
|
|
X-GPG-Keyserver: http://wwwkeys.pgp.net
|
|
X-GPG-Keynumber: 0xE580B363
|
|
X-GPG-Fingerprint: 75B1 F6D0 8368 38E7 A4C5 F6C2 02E3 9051 E580 B363
|
|
Sender: spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net
|
|
Errors-To: spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net
|
|
X-Beenthere: spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net
|
|
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net
|
|
Precedence: bulk
|
|
List-Help: <mailto:spamassassin-talk-request@example.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
|
|
List-Post: <mailto:spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net>
|
|
List-Subscribe: <https://example.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk>,
|
|
<mailto:spamassassin-talk-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
|
|
List-Id: Talk about SpamAssassin <spamassassin-talk.example.sourceforge.net>
|
|
List-Unsubscribe: <https://example.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk>,
|
|
<mailto:spamassassin-talk-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
|
|
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=spamassassin-talk>
|
|
X-Original-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 15:01:18 -0400
|
|
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 15:01:18 -0400
|
|
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-16.6 required=7.0
|
|
tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,
|
|
PGP_SIGNATURE_2,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
|
|
SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
|
|
version=2.50-cvs
|
|
X-Spam-Level:
|
|
|
|
|
|
--Fnm8lRGFTVS/3GuM
|
|
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
|
|
Content-Disposition: inline
|
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
|
|
|
|
On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 01:33:43PM -0500, vernon wrote:
|
|
> As I understand it, DNS A records are used in a rotating fashion for load
|
|
> balancing, but DNS MX records are used in order or prority, meaning the 10
|
|
> before the 20 and only 20 if the 10 isn't available.
|
|
|
|
That's the theory, yes.
|
|
|
|
> But only some of the mail is actually being scanned which leads me to
|
|
> believe that not all of the mail is actually hitting that box and the 10
|
|
> never goes down. Why? Have I got something confused here?
|
|
|
|
No, but either due to some technical glitch, or downright just wanting
|
|
to do so, people send to the secondary. It's a semi-usual spammer trick
|
|
actually to bypass the main server and send directly to a secondary
|
|
since it will either have less filtering, or be "trusted", or ...
|
|
|
|
MX records in the mail world are all explained in RFC 2821, section 5:
|
|
|
|
[...]
|
|
Multiple MX records contain a preference indication that MUST be used
|
|
in sorting (see below). Lower numbers are more preferred than higher
|
|
ones. If there are multiple destinations with the same preference
|
|
and there is no clear reason to favor one (e.g., by recognition of an
|
|
easily-reached address), then the sender-SMTP MUST randomize them to
|
|
spread the load across multiple mail exchangers for a specific
|
|
organization.
|
|
[...]
|
|
If it determines that it should relay the message without rewriting
|
|
the address, it MUST sort the MX records to determine candidates for
|
|
delivery. The records are first ordered by preference, with the
|
|
lowest-numbered records being most preferred. The relay host MUST
|
|
then inspect the list for any of the names or addresses by which it
|
|
might be known in mail transactions. If a matching record is found,
|
|
all records at that preference level and higher-numbered ones MUST be
|
|
discarded from consideration. If there are no records left at that
|
|
point, it is an error condition, and the message MUST be returned as
|
|
undeliverable. If records do remain, they SHOULD be tried, best
|
|
preference first, as described above.
|
|
|
|
--=20
|
|
Randomly Generated Tagline:
|
|
"Now let's say I like sheep... And now let's say I take the sheep to a=20
|
|
Christmas party..." - Bob Golub
|
|
|
|
--Fnm8lRGFTVS/3GuM
|
|
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
|
|
Content-Disposition: inline
|
|
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
|
|
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
|
|
|
|
iD8DBQE9gjX9AuOQUeWAs2MRAg7PAJ42kO68knZx76oQbrZPMGdg/JbJHACfQvlX
|
|
O/Utl8FY01aS+/e3VNE9WWM=
|
|
=O6kU
|
|
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
|
|
--Fnm8lRGFTVS/3GuM--
|
|
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------------------------------
|
|
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
|
|
Welcome to geek heaven.
|
|
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
|
|
_______________________________________________
|
|
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
|
|
Spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
|
|
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
|
|
|
|
|