StanfordMLOctave/machine-learning-ex6/ex6/easy_ham/1102.25a9175170413ba941d49d...

105 lines
4.9 KiB
Plaintext

From exmh-users-admin@redhat.com Fri Sep 13 18:40:35 2002
Return-Path: <exmh-users-admin@example.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24E1616F03
for <jm@localhost>; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 18:40:34 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
for jm@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 13 Sep 2002 18:40:34 +0100 (IST)
Received: from listman.example.com (listman.example.com [66.187.233.211]) by
dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8DH5cC27575 for
<jm-exmh@jmason.org>; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 18:05:38 +0100
Received: from listman.example.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D89D3F9CE; Fri, 13 Sep 2002
13:06:03 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: exmh-users@listman.example.com
Received: from int-mx1.corp.example.com (int-mx1.corp.example.com
[172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E15EC3F9CE
for <exmh-users@listman.redhat.com>; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 13:05:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mail@localhost) by int-mx1.corp.example.com (8.11.6/8.11.6)
id g8DH5Qi02324 for exmh-users@listman.redhat.com; Fri, 13 Sep 2002
13:05:26 -0400
Received: from mx1.example.com (mx1.example.com [172.16.48.31]) by
int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g8DH5Qk02320 for
<exmh-users@redhat.com>; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 13:05:26 -0400
Received: from lin12.triumf.ca
(IDENT:O1a17hgrh9hJ51MjhgnkNLni8RQK5mZ3@lin12.Triumf.CA [142.90.114.144])
by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g8DGmjw01679 for
<exmh-users@redhat.com>; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 12:48:45 -0400
Received: from lin12.triumf.ca (baartman@localhost) by lin12.triumf.ca
(8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8DH5Or30284 for <exmh-users@redhat.com>;
Fri, 13 Sep 2002 10:05:24 -0700
Message-Id: <200209131705.g8DH5Or30284@lin12.triumf.ca>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4
X-Url: http://www.triumf.ca/people/baartman/
X-Image-Url: http://lin12.triumf.ca/me3.gif
To: exmh-users@example.com
Subject: Re: bad focus/click behaviours
In-Reply-To: <200209131130.g8DBUZL24217@hobbit.linuxworks.com.au.nospam>
References: <200209131130.g8DBUZL24217@hobbit.linuxworks.com.au.nospam>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Rick Baartman <baartman@lin12.triumf.ca>
X-Loop: exmh-users@example.com
Sender: exmh-users-admin@example.com
Errors-To: exmh-users-admin@example.com
X-Beenthere: exmh-users@example.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: exmh-users@example.com
List-Help: <mailto:exmh-users-request@example.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:exmh-users@example.com>
List-Subscribe: <https://listman.example.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users>,
<mailto:exmh-users-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Discussion list for EXMH users <exmh-users.example.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://listman.example.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users>,
<mailto:exmh-users-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://listman.example.com/mailman/private/exmh-users/>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 10:05:23 -0700
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.0 required=7.0
tests=AWL,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,REFERENCES,
SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,X_LOOP
version=2.50-cvs
X-Spam-Level:
I've never understood the mouse buffer operation with exmh either. Here's the
behaviour I have. I have exmh and XEmacs windows up, and a terminal window. (I
also have gnome1.4 running and enlightenment as wm.) I select text in the exmh
window and while it is highlighted, I can paste into anything else. If I select
it and then click so the highlighting is off, then what I paste is not the
recently-selected text in exmh, but an old selection. If I select in XEmacs and
leave it highlighted, I can paste it into exmh sedit window; but if it is no
longer highlighted, what I paste is an old selection. I can live with this
behaviour except for one additional thing. If nothing is highlighted, then what
I paste into exmh is different from what I paste into other windows. To be more
specific, here's what gets pasted if nothing is highlighted:
Application What gets pasted
XEmacs whatever was last selected unless it was last selected in exmh
xterm same as XEmacs
AbiWord nothing
Nedit nothing
sedit Whatever was last highlighted in sedit and overwritten
The last needs some amplification. If I highlight something in sedit, then
obviously that's what gets pasted. If the highlighting is off, then what gets
pasted is NOT what was last highlighted in sedit, but what was last highlighted
and typed over (I have "Type Kills SEL" on.).
It seems that exmh and sedit are the oddballs here. Very often when I try to
paste something in sedit I end up muttering WTF??
--
rick
_______________________________________________
Exmh-users mailing list
Exmh-users@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users