132 lines
4.7 KiB
Plaintext
132 lines
4.7 KiB
Plaintext
From fork-admin@xent.com Fri Oct 4 18:19:18 2002
|
|
Return-Path: <fork-admin@xent.com>
|
|
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
|
|
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
|
|
by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DABDF16F17
|
|
for <jm@localhost>; Fri, 4 Oct 2002 18:19:14 +0100 (IST)
|
|
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
|
|
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
|
|
for jm@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 04 Oct 2002 18:19:14 +0100 (IST)
|
|
Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
|
|
(8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g94G6JK31288 for <jm@jmason.org>;
|
|
Fri, 4 Oct 2002 17:06:20 +0100
|
|
Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
|
|
with ESMTP id 70C6C2940A9; Fri, 4 Oct 2002 09:06:02 -0700 (PDT)
|
|
Delivered-To: fork@example.com
|
|
Received: from mail.lig.net (unknown [204.248.145.126]) by xent.com
|
|
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B5A629409A for <fork@xent.com>; Fri,
|
|
4 Oct 2002 09:05:16 -0700 (PDT)
|
|
Received: from lig.net (unknown [204.248.145.125]) by mail.lig.net
|
|
(Postfix) with ESMTP id F2D816A5B1; Fri, 4 Oct 2002 12:06:30 -0400 (EDT)
|
|
Message-Id: <6E8631AD.30501@lig.net>
|
|
From: "Stephen D. Williams" <sdw@lig.net>
|
|
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1)
|
|
Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0
|
|
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
|
|
MIME-Version: 1.0
|
|
To: Lorin Rivers <lrivers@realsoftware.com>
|
|
Cc: "Mr. FoRK" <fork_list@hotmail.com>, FoRK List <fork@example.com>
|
|
Subject: Re: ActiveBuddy
|
|
References: <B9C28892.35FF2%lrivers@realsoftware.com>
|
|
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
|
|
boundary="------------080209060700030309080805"
|
|
Sender: fork-admin@xent.com
|
|
Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com
|
|
X-Beenthere: fork@example.com
|
|
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
|
|
Precedence: bulk
|
|
List-Help: <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=help>
|
|
List-Post: <mailto:fork@example.com>
|
|
List-Subscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>, <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=subscribe>
|
|
List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare <fork.xent.com>
|
|
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>,
|
|
<mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=unsubscribe>
|
|
List-Archive: <http://xent.com/pipermail/fork/>
|
|
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2028 12:05:01 -0400
|
|
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=5.0
|
|
tests=DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_XX,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,HTML_TITLE_EMPTY,
|
|
KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,MAILTO_LINK,REFERENCES,
|
|
T_NONSENSE_FROM_99_100,USER_AGENT,X_ACCEPT_LANG
|
|
version=2.50-cvs
|
|
X-Spam-Level:
|
|
|
|
|
|
--------------080209060700030309080805
|
|
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
|
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
|
|
|
|
I actually thought of this kind of active chat at AOL (in 1996 I think),
|
|
bringing up ads based on what was being discussed and other features.
|
|
For a while, the VP of dev. (now still CTO I think) was really hot on
|
|
the idea and they discussed patenting it. Then they lost interest.
|
|
Probably a good thing.
|
|
|
|
sdw
|
|
|
|
Lorin Rivers wrote:
|
|
|
|
>On 10/2/02 12:00 PM, "Mr. FoRK" <fork_list@hotmail.com> wrote:
|
|
>
|
|
>
|
|
>>What about a situation where you don't directly ask/talk to the bot, but
|
|
>>they listen in and advise/correct/interject/etc?
|
|
>>example: two people discussing trips, etc. may trigger a weather bot to
|
|
>>mention what the forecast says - without directly being asked.
|
|
>>
|
|
>>
|
|
>
|
|
>My guess is it's more insidious than that, it's going to be ActiveSpam.
|
|
>
|
|
>"Oh, you're going to Seattle? I can get you airline tickets for less"
|
|
>
|
|
>Yuck
|
|
>
|
|
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
--------------080209060700030309080805
|
|
Content-Type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII
|
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
|
|
|
|
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
|
|
<html>
|
|
<head>
|
|
<title></title>
|
|
</head>
|
|
<body>
|
|
I actually thought of this kind of active chat at AOL (in 1996 I think),
|
|
bringing up ads based on what was being discussed and other features. For
|
|
a while, the VP of dev. (now still CTO I think) was really hot on the idea
|
|
and they discussed patenting it. Then they lost interest. Probably a good
|
|
thing.<br>
|
|
<br>
|
|
sdw<br>
|
|
<br>
|
|
Lorin Rivers wrote:<br>
|
|
<blockquote type="cite"
|
|
cite="midB9C28892.35FF2%25lrivers@realsoftware.com">
|
|
<pre wrap="">On 10/2/02 12:00 PM, "Mr. FoRK" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:fork_list@hotmail.com"><fork_list@hotmail.com></a> wrote:
|
|
</pre>
|
|
<blockquote type="cite">
|
|
<pre wrap="">What about a situation where you don't directly ask/talk to the bot, but
|
|
they listen in and advise/correct/interject/etc?
|
|
example: two people discussing trips, etc. may trigger a weather bot to
|
|
mention what the forecast says - without directly being asked.
|
|
</pre>
|
|
</blockquote>
|
|
<pre wrap=""><!---->
|
|
My guess is it's more insidious than that, it's going to be ActiveSpam.
|
|
|
|
"Oh, you're going to Seattle? I can get you airline tickets for less"
|
|
|
|
Yuck
|
|
</pre>
|
|
</blockquote>
|
|
<br>
|
|
</body>
|
|
</html>
|
|
|
|
--------------080209060700030309080805--
|
|
|
|
|