StanfordMLOctave/machine-learning-ex6/ex6/easy_ham/0746.eb20a810f43c9bd9663c0d...

95 lines
4.4 KiB
Plaintext

From fork-admin@xent.com Sat Sep 21 20:22:00 2002
Return-Path: <fork-admin@xent.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD09C16F03
for <jm@localhost>; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 20:21:59 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
for jm@localhost (single-drop); Sat, 21 Sep 2002 20:21:59 +0100 (IST)
Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
(8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8LEVuC24942 for <jm@jmason.org>;
Sat, 21 Sep 2002 15:31:57 +0100
Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 7E63F294189; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 07:28:08 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: fork@example.com
Received: from smtp1.superb.net (smtp1.superb.net [207.228.225.14]) by
xent.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B6EA829409C for <fork@xent.com>;
Sat, 21 Sep 2002 07:27:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 11884 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2002 14:30:44 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO maya.dyndns.org) (207.61.5.143) by
smtp1.superb.net with SMTP; 21 Sep 2002 14:30:44 -0000
Received: by maya.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 501) id A5A041C2C4;
Sat, 21 Sep 2002 10:30:37 -0400 (EDT)
To: "Mr. FoRK" <fork_list@hotmail.com>
Cc: <fork@example.com>
Subject: Re: sed /s/United States/Roman Empire/g
References: <979BE8FE-CCF6-11D6-817E-000393A46DEA@alumni.caltech.edu>
<DAV72xvjPkQTGpaoG1V00000fd0@hotmail.com>
From: Gary Lawrence Murphy <garym@canada.com>
X-Home-Page: http://www.teledyn.com
Organization: TCI Business Innovation through Open Source Computing
Message-Id: <m27khfl8j6.fsf@maya.dyndns.org>
Reply-To: Gary Lawrence Murphy <garym@canada.com>
X-Url: http://www.teledyn.com/
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: fork-admin@xent.com
Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com
X-Beenthere: fork@example.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:fork@example.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>, <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare <fork.xent.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>,
<mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://xent.com/pipermail/fork/>
Date: 21 Sep 2002 10:30:37 -0400
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.7 required=5.0
tests=AWL,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,NOSPAM_INC,REFERENCES,
SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,T_FROM_HAS_ALPHAS
version=2.50-cvs
X-Spam-Level:
>>>>> "f" == fork list <Mr.> writes:
f> "Free trade and free markets have proven their ability to lift
f> whole societies out of poverty" I'm not a
f> socio-political/history buff - does anybody have some clear
f> examples?
China? Ooops, no wait, scratch that.
There is one counter example that I can think of, but it may not be
precisely "free trade/markets" -- when Ben Franklin first visited
England he was asked why the colonies were so prosperous. Ben
explained that they used "Colonial Script", a kind of barter-dollar,
and increasing the supply of script ensured complete employment. The
British bankers were furious and immediately lobbied parliament to
clamp down on the practice. Within a few years, the colonies were
rife with unemployment and poverty just like the rest of the Empire.
According to questionable literature handed out by a fringe political
party here in Canada, the Founding Fathers had no real complaint about
tea taxes, it was the banning of colonial script they were
protesting. If this is true, then it comes right back to the forces
that killed Ned Ludd's followers as to why popular opinion believes
they were protesting a tea tax. The same pamphlet claimed that Canada
was also a prosperous nation until, by an act of parliament in the
late-50's or early 60's, the right to print money was removed from the
juristiction of parliament and handed over to the Bank of Canada.
I've wondered about all this. Certainly the timeline of the collapse
of the Canadian economy fits the profile, but there are oodles of
other causes (for example, spending money like we had 300M people when
we only had 20M) Anyone have any further information on this?
--
Gary Lawrence Murphy - garym@teledyn.com - TeleDynamics Communications
- blog: http://www.auracom.com/~teledyn - biz: http://teledyn.com/ -
"Computers are useless. They can only give you answers." (Picasso)