111 lines
4.8 KiB
Plaintext
111 lines
4.8 KiB
Plaintext
From fork-admin@xent.com Fri Sep 20 16:16:02 2002
|
|
Return-Path: <fork-admin@xent.com>
|
|
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
|
|
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
|
|
by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCDE116F03
|
|
for <jm@localhost>; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 16:16:01 +0100 (IST)
|
|
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
|
|
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
|
|
for jm@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 20 Sep 2002 16:16:01 +0100 (IST)
|
|
Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
|
|
(8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8KEvoC09954 for <jm@jmason.org>;
|
|
Fri, 20 Sep 2002 15:57:51 +0100
|
|
Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
|
|
with ESMTP id DF6F4294176; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 07:54:06 -0700 (PDT)
|
|
Delivered-To: fork@example.com
|
|
Received: from Boron.MeepZor.Com (i.meepzor.com [204.146.167.214]) by
|
|
xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87F8F294176 for <fork@xent.com>;
|
|
Fri, 20 Sep 2002 07:53:05 -0700 (PDT)
|
|
Received: from sashimi (dmz-firewall [206.199.198.4]) by Boron.MeepZor.Com
|
|
(8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g8KEuUQ02494; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 10:56:31 -0400
|
|
From: "Bill Stoddard" <bill@wstoddard.com>
|
|
To: "Ned Jackson Lovely" <fork@qu.to>,
|
|
"Fork@Xent.Com" <fork@xent.com>
|
|
Subject: RE: Hanson's Sept 11 message in the National Review
|
|
Message-Id: <JHEPKCEMGPKFFDHHDDKDGEOJFGAA.bill@wstoddard.com>
|
|
MIME-Version: 1.0
|
|
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
|
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
|
|
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
|
|
X-Msmail-Priority: Normal
|
|
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
|
|
In-Reply-To: <20020920023953.GH1024@ibu.internal.qu.to>
|
|
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
|
|
Importance: Normal
|
|
Sender: fork-admin@xent.com
|
|
Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com
|
|
X-Beenthere: fork@example.com
|
|
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
|
|
Precedence: bulk
|
|
List-Help: <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=help>
|
|
List-Post: <mailto:fork@example.com>
|
|
List-Subscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>, <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=subscribe>
|
|
List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare <fork.xent.com>
|
|
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>,
|
|
<mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=unsubscribe>
|
|
List-Archive: <http://xent.com/pipermail/fork/>
|
|
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 10:45:19 -0400
|
|
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.4 required=5.0
|
|
tests=AWL,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT
|
|
version=2.50-cvs
|
|
X-Spam-Level:
|
|
|
|
|
|
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 11:11:47AM -0400, Bill Stoddard wrote:
|
|
> > people? Either these folks are social misfits who have no
|
|
> understanding of
|
|
> > human interactions (else they would try more constructive means
|
|
> to get their
|
|
> > message across) or they are just out to get their rocks off
|
|
> regardless of
|
|
> > how it affects other people, and that is immoral at best and
|
|
> downright evil
|
|
> > at worst.
|
|
>
|
|
> Are you kidding? It was fucking BRILLIANT. Do you know what
|
|
> exposure that got
|
|
> them? They sat perfectly so that the cameras could focus on the mildly
|
|
> exasperated Rumsfeld and their "UN Inspections not war" banner.
|
|
|
|
What I am specifically referring to is protesters shouting down speakers or
|
|
making so much noise that it interferes with the speaker. That's wrong,
|
|
immoral and unethical no matter what the political bent of the speakers and
|
|
the protesters. Rowdy protests in their own venue (on a college campus or
|
|
some of the commons areas of DC) is perfectly fine by me. Waving signs to
|
|
get attention is fine.
|
|
|
|
> That picture
|
|
> will be dominating the news cycles in China, Iraq, Russia, Germany, and
|
|
> France, at least. For goodness sakes, you're arguing about it on FoRK. In
|
|
> politics by sound-bite, those two rude hags kicked ass and took names.
|
|
>
|
|
> For the record, I don't think they even got arrested, which is a shame.
|
|
|
|
Well, Owen implied the protesters were arrested. Was he just jacking himself
|
|
off at the expense of other people? Exactly why is it a shame that they were
|
|
not arrested? Think about what you are saying and what you are telegraphing
|
|
about your state of mind here. You WANT people to do bad things (ie, police
|
|
arresting peaceful protesters) if it can help you further your cause? That
|
|
attitude just sucks. You have no moral ground to stand on if that is what
|
|
you believe.
|
|
|
|
> It is part of the game -- make an ass of yourself, get your point on
|
|
> the nightly
|
|
> news, spend a couple days in the clink for disorderly.
|
|
|
|
Sure, just don't whine about getting arrested if you make it a point to get
|
|
in someone's face.
|
|
|
|
One other comment... Most of the people that are protesting against taking
|
|
out the Iraqi dictator wouldn't give a rats ass if a nuke went off in NYC.
|
|
They simply wouldn't care so why in the hell should the Americal public
|
|
listen to them on matters of national security?
|
|
|
|
So enlighten me, exactly why shouldn't Hussein be taken out? And if your
|
|
answr boils down to "i don't give a shit about what happens to the US", you
|
|
can kiss my ass :-)
|
|
|
|
Bill
|
|
|
|
|