60 lines
2.3 KiB
Plaintext
60 lines
2.3 KiB
Plaintext
From fork-admin@xent.com Sat Sep 7 21:53:30 2002
|
|
Return-Path: <fork-admin@xent.com>
|
|
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
|
|
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
|
|
by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE34616F16
|
|
for <jm@localhost>; Sat, 7 Sep 2002 21:52:37 +0100 (IST)
|
|
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
|
|
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
|
|
for jm@localhost (single-drop); Sat, 07 Sep 2002 21:52:37 +0100 (IST)
|
|
Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
|
|
(8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g87Du7C22075 for <jm@jmason.org>;
|
|
Sat, 7 Sep 2002 14:56:07 +0100
|
|
Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
|
|
with ESMTP id AD1A32940A0; Sat, 7 Sep 2002 06:53:03 -0700 (PDT)
|
|
Delivered-To: fork@example.com
|
|
Received: from argote.ch (argote.ch [80.65.224.17]) by xent.com (Postfix)
|
|
with ESMTP id 4B03129409E for <fork@xent.com>; Sat, 7 Sep 2002 06:52:10
|
|
-0700 (PDT)
|
|
Received: by argote.ch (Postfix, from userid 500) id 7E5CBC44D;
|
|
Sat, 7 Sep 2002 15:52:57 +0200 (CEST)
|
|
To: fork@example.com
|
|
Subject: Re: Selling Wedded Bliss (was Re: Ouch...)
|
|
Message-Id: <20020907135257.7E5CBC44D@argote.ch>
|
|
From: harley@argote.ch (Robert Harley)
|
|
Sender: fork-admin@xent.com
|
|
Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com
|
|
X-Beenthere: fork@example.com
|
|
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
|
|
Precedence: bulk
|
|
List-Help: <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=help>
|
|
List-Post: <mailto:fork@example.com>
|
|
List-Subscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>, <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=subscribe>
|
|
List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare <fork.xent.com>
|
|
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>,
|
|
<mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=unsubscribe>
|
|
List-Archive: <http://xent.com/pipermail/fork/>
|
|
Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2002 15:52:57 +0200 (CEST)
|
|
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=7.0
|
|
tests=KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
|
|
version=2.50-cvs
|
|
X-Spam-Level:
|
|
|
|
CDale URLed thusly:
|
|
>http://www.news.harvard.edu/gazette/2000/10.19/01_monogamy.html
|
|
|
|
>The assumption that females of all species tend to be less promiscuous
|
|
>than males simply does not fit the facts, Hrdy contended.
|
|
|
|
Well, DUH!!!
|
|
|
|
It is perfectly obvious that (heterosexual) promiscuity is exactly,
|
|
precisely identical between males and females.
|
|
|
|
Of course the shapes of the distributions may differ.
|
|
|
|
|
|
R
|
|
|
|
|