From rssfeeds@jmason.org Wed Sep 25 10:23:39 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1]) by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68DA216F03 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 10:23:39 +0100 (IST) Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 25 Sep 2002 10:23:39 +0100 (IST) Received: from dogma.slashnull.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8P80MC18079 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 09:00:22 +0100 Message-Id: <200209250800.g8P80MC18079@dogma.slashnull.org> To: yyyy@example.com From: scripting Subject: NY Times: "Google's automated editors appeared to match the work of human Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 08:00:22 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; encoding=utf-8 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL version=2.50-cvs X-Spam-Level: URL: http://scriptingnews.userland.com/backissues/2002/09/24#When:8:05:13AM Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 15:05:13 GMT NY Times[1]: "Google's automated editors appeared to match the work of human competitors." [1] http://www.nytimes.com/2002/09/24/technology/24GOOG.html?ex=1033444800&en=0557fe246dd68b12&ei=5007&partner=USERLAND