From razor-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Mon Aug 26 15:18:35 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.netnoteinc.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 017124416E for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 10:15:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 26 Aug 2002 15:15:59 +0100 (IST) Received: from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net [216.136.171.252]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7O8pcZ29845 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 09:51:38 +0100 Received: from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13] helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17iWOq-00066d-00; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 01:36:04 -0700 Received: from nick.dcs.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.88.61] helo=nick) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17iWOm-0000vq-00 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 01:36:01 -0700 Received: from 81-86-135-90.dsl.pipex.com ([81.86.135.90] helo=guest1.mews) by nick with asmtp (TLSv1:EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.10) id 17iWOb-0004VE-00; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 09:35:49 +0100 From: mb/vipul@dcs.qmul.ac.uk X-X-Sender: mb@guest1.mews To: "Bort, Paul" Cc: razor-users@example.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: [Razor-users] Razor with sendmail In-Reply-To: Message-Id: X-Url: http://www.theBachChoir.org.uk/ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Auth-User: mb X-Uvscan-Result: clean (17iWOb-0004VE-00) Sender: razor-users-admin@example.sourceforge.net Errors-To: razor-users-admin@example.sourceforge.net X-Beenthere: razor-users@example.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Original-Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 09:48:57 +0100 (BST) Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 09:48:57 +0100 (BST) Lines: 24 X-Pyzor: Reported 0 times. X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=7.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,FOR_FREE,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST, NO_REAL_NAME,SPAM_PHRASE_02_03,USER_AGENT_PINE version=2.40-cvs X-Spam-Level: On Aug 23 Bort, Paul wrote: >If your sendmail has been compiled with Milter support, you can add SMRazor >easily. We've been using it for a while without problems. Others on the list >have mentioned it as well. > >http://www.sapros.com/smrazor/ Does this fork+exec a perl interpreter for every incoming mail? If so, I reckon your mailer is vulerable to a DoS attack without too much effort... The real question is: is there a way to run razor without this overhead? Even some sort of razord you could talk to over a unix socket would do. Until I can find one, I cannot spare the resources to run razor at all :( ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 _______________________________________________ Razor-users mailing list Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users