From spamassassin-talk-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Mon Oct 7 20:37:15 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1]) by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8A0116F16 for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2002 20:37:14 +0100 (IST) Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 07 Oct 2002 20:37:14 +0100 (IST) Received: from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net [216.136.171.252]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g97JJVK13715 for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2002 20:19:32 +0100 Received: from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13] helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17ydPJ-0000uV-00; Mon, 07 Oct 2002 12:19:09 -0700 Received: from relay05.indigo.ie ([194.125.133.229]) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with smtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17ydOd-0007iV-00 for ; Mon, 07 Oct 2002 12:18:27 -0700 Received: (qmail 79119 messnum 1202246 invoked from network[194.125.172.237/ts12-237.dublin.indigo.ie]); 7 Oct 2002 19:18:21 -0000 Received: from ts12-237.dublin.indigo.ie (HELO example.com) (194.125.172.237) by relay05.indigo.ie (qp 79119) with SMTP; 7 Oct 2002 19:18:21 -0000 Received: by example.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 18C6916F03; Mon, 7 Oct 2002 20:18:20 +0100 (IST) Received: from example.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by example.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 152DCF7B1; Mon, 7 Oct 2002 20:18:20 +0100 (IST) To: "Kenneth Nerhood" Cc: spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Re: AWL bug in 2.42? In-Reply-To: Message from "Kenneth Nerhood" of "Mon, 07 Oct 2002 14:54:11 EDT." From: yyyy@example.com (Justin Mason) X-GPG-Key-Fingerprint: 0A48 2D8B 0B52 A87D 0E8A 6ADD 4137 1B50 6E58 EF0A X-Habeas-Swe-1: winter into spring X-Habeas-Swe-2: brightly anticipated X-Habeas-Swe-3: like Habeas SWE (tm) X-Habeas-Swe-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm) X-Habeas-Swe-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this X-Habeas-Swe-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas X-Habeas-Swe-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant X-Habeas-Swe-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this X-Habeas-Swe-9: mark in spam to . Message-Id: <20021007191820.18C6916F03@example.com> Sender: spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net Errors-To: spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net X-Beenthere: spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Talk about SpamAssassin List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Original-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 20:18:15 +0100 Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 20:18:15 +0100 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-44.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,HABEAS_SWE,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,T_NONSENSE_FROM_00_10 version=2.50-cvs X-Spam-Level: Kenneth Nerhood said: > I too am seeing very weird things with 2.42 and AWL. I installed a > fresh system, and then ran a bunch of test spam through it (all from the > same user). All messages should have scored over 15. The AWL kept > adjusting them down so that after about 10 message I had a negative > score. I'm using spamc/d. That's exactly what is intended; the idea is that legit senders who habitually score just > 5, will eventually get out of "AWL hell" after 6-10 messages. Note that running a single spam through "spamassassin -a -t" *will* eventually whitelist the spammer. but that's why the man page tells you not to do it ;) --j. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list Spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk