Replied: Sat, 05 Oct 2002 13:03:11 +0100 Replied: Justin Mason Replied: Craig R Hughes Replied: Daniel Quinlan Replied: SpamAssassin Developers From craig@hughes-family.org Sat Oct 5 12:38:05 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1]) by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C055216F03 for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 12:38:04 +0100 (IST) Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Sat, 05 Oct 2002 12:38:04 +0100 (IST) Received: from granger.mail.mindspring.net (granger.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.148]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g958BfK03016 for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 09:11:41 +0100 Received: from user-2injgi2.dsl.mindspring.com ([165.121.194.66] helo=belphegore.hughes-family.org) by granger.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 17xk2y-0007R8-00; Sat, 05 Oct 2002 04:12:24 -0400 Received: from belphegore.hughes-family.org (unknown [10.0.240.200]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by belphegore.hughes-family.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BB783FDD; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 01:12:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 01:12:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Craig R Hughes To: Daniel Quinlan Cc: Justin Mason , SpamAssassin Developers Subject: Re: [SAdev] nightly mass-check and hit-frequencies In-Reply-To: Message-Id: X-Habeas-Swe-1: winter into spring X-Habeas-Swe-2: brightly anticipated X-Habeas-Swe-3: like Habeas SWE (tm) X-Habeas-Swe-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm) X-Habeas-Swe-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this X-Habeas-Swe-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas X-Habeas-Swe-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant X-Habeas-Swe-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this X-Habeas-Swe-9: mark in spam to . MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,FORGED_RCVD_TRAIL,HABEAS_SWE, IN_REP_TO,T_NONSENSE_FROM_30_40,USER_AGENT_PINE version=2.50-cvs X-Spam-Level: Daniel Quinlan wrote: DQ> jm@jmason.org (Justin Mason) writes: DQ> DQ> > But I think rsync is key; it's very efficient bandwidth-wise, and it DQ> > allows you to select which ones you want just as well as wget would. DQ> > (Bandwidth is a much bigger issue for me and some other of the europeans DQ> > involved, than it would be for you guys ;) IMO it's by far the most DQ> > efficient and scriptable way to do this stuff, these days. DQ> DQ> It must be horrible being a dial-up user in 2002. If we can *automate* DQ> rsync submission with good *authentication*, it would be fine with me. DQ> The current rsync method is not sufficiently authenticated, though. I'll take a look at it. I'm sure there's got to be some reasonly easy way to have rsync carry itself over ssh and secure access using ssh keys. DQ> > I suggest we use the hughes-family.org server for rsyncing, as we do for DQ> > the corpus_submit stuff -- in a separate subdirectory, though! -- then DQ> > I'll take a look at getting a nightly hit-frequencies-collation system DQ> > going. Ok, I'll take a look at it. C