From quinlan@pathname.com  Fri Sep 20 11:28:07 2002
Return-Path: <quinlan@pathname.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2948016F16
	for <jm@localhost>; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 11:28:06 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 20 Sep 2002 11:28:06 +0100 (IST)
Received: from proton.pathname.com
    (adsl-216-103-211-240.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [216.103.211.240]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8JLUVC04528 for
    <jm@jmason.org>; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 22:30:31 +0100
Received: from quinlan by proton.pathname.com with local (Exim 3.35 #1
    (Debian)) id 17s8t2-0003Io-00; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 14:31:00 -0700
To: yyyy@example.com (Justin Mason)
Cc: Matt Kettler <mkettler_sa@comcast.net>,
	SpamAssassin-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [SAdev] phew!
References: <20020919113604.D475F16F1C@example.com>
From: Daniel Quinlan <quinlan@pathname.com>
Date: 19 Sep 2002 14:31:00 -0700
In-Reply-To: yyyy@example.com's message of "Thu, 19 Sep 2002 12:35:59 +0100"
Message-Id: <yf2elbpwtt7.fsf@proton.pathname.com>
Lines: 8
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.9 required=5.0
	tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
	      REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES
	version=2.50-cvs
X-Spam-Level: 

jm@jmason.org (Justin Mason) writes:

> Yes -- 50% of the entire set for training and 50% for evaluation.

Once you've settled on the final method for any one release, why not
use 100% of the data for a final run?
 
Dan