From spamassassin-talk-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Thu Sep 12 15:03:28 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1]) by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63AFD16F03 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 15:03:28 +0100 (IST) Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 12 Sep 2002 15:03:28 +0100 (IST) Received: from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net [216.136.171.252]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8CDChC32028 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 14:12:43 +0100 Received: from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13] helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17pTfa-0007C9-00; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 06:06:06 -0700 Received: from dsl-65-187-227-177.telocity.com ([65.187.227.177] helo=purestmail.com) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17pTfO-0002KB-00 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 06:05:54 -0700 Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([192.168.1.2] verified) by purestmail.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b7) with ESMTP id 205148 for spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 09:05:51 -0400 From: "Eric Mings" To: "Spamassassin Talk" Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Bayesian and bogofilter Message-Id: <20020912130550.1275@192.168.1.3> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: CTM PowerMail 4.0 carbon MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net Errors-To: spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net X-Beenthere: spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Talk about SpamAssassin List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Original-Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 09:05:50 -0400 Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 09:05:50 -0400 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=7.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_TRAIL,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,REFERENCES, SIGNATURE_LONG_SPARSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.50-cvs X-Spam-Level: >Anyway I'm making good progress and my implementation works reasonably >well. It now seems blindingly clear that we want a tightly-integrated >implementation of Naive Bayes spam/nonspam classification. There are >still some things about how to do this right inside SA that I still am >figuring out. > >Dan This is very good news! Will this allow for individual spam word file preferences when spamassassin is running on a mailserver for multiple users? This would be an outstanding addition if it can be done. Thanks much for a great project. -- Regards, Eric Mings Ph.D. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list Spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk