From exmh-workers-admin@redhat.com Wed Oct 2 15:58:49 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1]) by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C8716F03 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 15:58:48 +0100 (IST) Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 02 Oct 2002 15:58:48 +0100 (IST) Received: from listman.example.com (listman.example.com [66.187.233.211]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g92DwjK11512 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 14:58:46 +0100 Received: from listman.example.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4A613EFFA; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 09:59:19 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: exmh-workers@listman.example.com Received: from int-mx1.corp.example.com (int-mx1.corp.example.com [172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2FFC3F792 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 09:54:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from mail@localhost) by int-mx1.corp.example.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g92DsCq16707 for exmh-workers@listman.redhat.com; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 09:54:12 -0400 Received: from mx1.example.com (mx1.example.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g92DsCf16703 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 09:54:12 -0400 Received: from kcmso2.proxy.att.com (kcmso2.att.com [192.128.134.71]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g92DZMi25039 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 09:35:22 -0400 Received: from ulysses.homer.att.com ([135.205.193.8]) by kcmso2.proxy.att.com (AT&T IPNS/MSO-4.0) with ESMTP id g92Ds6Od028475 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 08:54:06 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hera.homer.att.com (hera.homer.att.com [135.205.193.102]) by ulysses.homer.att.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA05531 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 09:54:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hera.homer.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.homer.att.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA13534 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 09:54:04 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200210021354.JAA13534@hera.homer.att.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5-CVS 08/22/2002 with nmh-1.0.4 To: exmh-workers@example.com Subject: A couple of nits... MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: "J. W. Ballantine" X-Loop: exmh-workers@example.com Sender: exmh-workers-admin@example.com Errors-To: exmh-workers-admin@example.com X-Beenthere: exmh-workers@example.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion list for EXMH developers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 09:54:04 -0400 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,X_LOOP version=2.50-cvs X-Spam-Level: I have a couple of small issues, and I'm not sure if their exmh issues or my setup issues. First, when I try and run exmh with wish from tk8.4.0 it seems to take forever to start, but with wish from tk8.a.4 it starts in a snap. Using the latest CVS, when I open exmh and the folder I'm in has unseen messages and I hit next, exmh changes to the next folder with unseen messages rather than to the first unseen in the current folder. Finally, when I reach the end of the messages in a folder and go on to the next unseen, exmh always goes back to inbox (which has no unseen messages) rather than the next folder with unseen messages. (When I goto next from inbox it does go where I would think it should go). Just wanted to let you know what I'm seeing and find out if I'm expecting some different than I should be. Thanks for all the effort Jim _______________________________________________ Exmh-workers mailing list Exmh-workers@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers