From rpm-list-admin@freshrpms.net Thu Sep 19 13:02:21 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1]) by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 100B516F03 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 13:02:21 +0100 (IST) Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 19 Sep 2002 13:02:21 +0100 (IST) Received: from egwn.net (ns2.egwn.net [193.172.5.4]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8JBC9C16961 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 12:12:09 +0100 Received: from auth02.nl.egwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by egwn.net (8.11.6/8.11.6/EGWN) with ESMTP id g8JB91f09494; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 13:09:01 +0200 Received: from python (gw01.es3.egwn.net [212.9.66.13]) (authenticated) by egwn.net (8.11.6/8.11.6/EGWN) with ESMTP id g8JB8Wf08829 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 13:08:32 +0200 From: Matthias Saou To: rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net Subject: Re: --with ... Message-Id: <20020919130825.16f0b1c8.matthias@rpmforge.net> In-Reply-To: <3D89AA17.4090005@leenx.co.za> References: <20020919100001.21684.81501.Mailman@auth02> <3D89AA17.4090005@leenx.co.za> Organization: freshrpms.net / rpmforge.net X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.2claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux) X-Operating-System: Red Hat GNU/Linux forever! X-Subliminal-Message: Use Linux... use Linux... use Linux... MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailscanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Sender: rpm-zzzlist-admin@freshrpms.net Errors-To: rpm-zzzlist-admin@freshrpms.net X-Beenthere: rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rpm-zzzlist@freshrpms.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Freshrpms RPM discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Original-Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 13:08:25 +0200 Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 13:08:25 +0200 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,NOSPAM_INC, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES, SIGNATURE_SHORT_SPARSE version=2.50-cvs X-Spam-Level: Once upon a time, C.Lee wrote : > > I think I'll use this "--with " switch more and more where > > possible. > Mmm, great stuff ... Now to get the RedHat Samba packager to do the > same thing ... I'm sure that if you file a bugzilla entry with a relevant patch against the spec file, chances of getting the change done are on your side ;-) > I have used there spec file and fun a few problems in it, and one > of them was just hashing out things for other use ... > > Now to get to grips with the Kernel ... still have not found and > easy way to rebuild the Kernel without having to wait and hour for > it to generate the headers for all arch ... arrrrhhhh ... The problem is that "--with --without " is clearly not meant to change deeply the way a package is built. Its use would be more like enabling/disabling gpg, ldap, whateversql support in packages as it's not possible to use something like "--with-=" which could be used for a much wider scope. Matthias -- Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/ Red Hat Linux release 7.3 (Valhalla) running Linux kernel 2.4.18-10 Load : 0.00 0.12 0.32, AC on-line, battery charging: 100% (4:47) _______________________________________________ RPM-List mailing list http://lists.freshrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list