From exmh-users-admin@redhat.com Mon Sep 23 12:06:18 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1]) by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F1BE16F03 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 12:06:17 +0100 (IST) Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 23 Sep 2002 12:06:17 +0100 (IST) Received: from listman.example.com (listman.example.com [66.187.233.211]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8N4wUC01425 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 05:58:30 +0100 Received: from listman.example.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 528BB3EA45; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 00:59:02 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: exmh-users@listman.example.com Received: from int-mx1.corp.example.com (int-mx1.corp.example.com [172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF8A23EA09 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 00:58:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from mail@localhost) by int-mx1.corp.example.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g8N4wbt18650 for exmh-users@listman.redhat.com; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 00:58:37 -0400 Received: from mx1.example.com (mx1.example.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g8N4wbh18646 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 00:58:37 -0400 Received: from blackcomb.panasas.com (gw2.panasas.com [65.194.124.178]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g8N4ewi21751 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 00:40:58 -0400 Received: from medlicott.panasas.com (IDENT:welch@medlicott.panasas.com [172.17.132.188]) by blackcomb.panasas.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA08321 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 00:58:30 -0400 Message-Id: <200209230458.AAA08321@blackcomb.panasas.com> To: exmh-users@example.com Subject: Re: Linking message [was: Re: Patch to complete a change...] In-Reply-To: <26040.1031911795@munnari.OZ.AU> References: <23204.1031891193@dimebox> <200209130231.g8D2VO021580@hobbit.linuxworks.com.au.nospam> <26040.1031911795@munnari.OZ.AU> Comments: In-reply-to Robert Elz message dated "Fri, 13 Sep 2002 17:09:55 +0700." From: Brent Welch X-Url: http://www.panasas.com/ X-Face: "HxE|?EnC9fVMV8f70H83&{fgLE.|FZ^$>@Q(yb#N,Eh~N]e&]=>r5~UnRml1:4EglY{9B+ :'wJq$@c_C!l8@<$t,{YUr4K,QJGHSvS~U]H`<+L*x?eGzSk>XH\W:AK\j?@?c1o List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion list for EXMH users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 21:58:30 -0700 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,REFERENCES,X_LOOP version=2.50-cvs X-Spam-Level: Both Move and Link are one-click actions. on a folder label Move's the current message on a folder label Link's the current message >>>Robert Elz said: > Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 23:26:33 -0500 > From: Hal DeVore > Message-ID: <23204.1031891193@dimebox> > > | 1) Right click on the folder label in the folder list > > That (the way I have it configured, and it sounds as if the way Tony does > too) just does a move (rather than select as target without moving). > > Of course, if you can manage to get no messages currently selected, then > it works fine. > > | 2) In the main window, the "+" key puts you into a "change > | folder" mode (the first time you use it after starting exmh), > | hit a second + and you go to "set a target" mode. Type a few > | characters of the folder name and hit space for autocomplete. > > This works, but is not nice if you're not using the keyboard, but just > the mouse. > > Tony: I agree - a nice way to link in one click would be good, and should > be easy to add, though currently adding mouse bindings (something like > shift right click would be a good choice) is much harder than adding > key bindings. > > But note there's no need to "undo" - the way I generally use link, if > the desired destination folder isn't the current selected target, is > to right click on the target, which selects it and moves the message, > (and because I have the "automatic move to the next message on move or > link option set) select the message again, and then "Link". > > Exmh only permits one uncomitted action to be selected for a message at a > time, that is, one of delete, move, or link. Selecting any of those > implicitly undoes any previous choice from the three (so you cannot > achieve a "move" by doing a link, then delete, then commit, it needs to > be link, commit, delete, commit). (xmh was just the same there incidentally ). > > | How's spring shaping up "down under"? > > No meaningful comment from me, I'm not there at the minute. But I'm told > that where I'm from it is cold, wet, and miserable, though has been better > during the day (sunny days, cold nights) for the past few. In any case, > all of that is a good enough reason to stay away... > > kre > > > > _______________________________________________ > Exmh-users mailing list > Exmh-users@redhat.com > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users -- Brent Welch Software Architect, Panasas Inc Pioneering the World's Most Scalable and Agile Storage Network www.panasas.com welch@panasas.com _______________________________________________ Exmh-users mailing list Exmh-users@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users