From exmh-users-admin@redhat.com Wed Sep 11 13:43:12 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1]) by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2154316F03 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 13:43:12 +0100 (IST) Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 11 Sep 2002 13:43:12 +0100 (IST) Received: from listman.example.com (listman.example.com [66.187.233.211]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8ALpkC18012 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 22:51:46 +0100 Received: from listman.example.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 029BA403DD; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 17:42:14 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: exmh-users@listman.example.com Received: from int-mx1.corp.example.com (int-mx1.corp.example.com [172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 613AE3FEC0 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 17:32:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from mail@localhost) by int-mx1.corp.example.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g8ALVts11608 for exmh-users@listman.redhat.com; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 17:31:55 -0400 Received: from mx1.example.com (mx1.example.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g8ALVtk11604 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 17:31:55 -0400 Received: from blackcomb.panasas.com (gw2.panasas.com [65.194.124.178]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g8ALFWw31621 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 17:15:32 -0400 Received: from medlicott.panasas.com (IDENT:welch@medlicott.panasas.com [172.17.132.188]) by blackcomb.panasas.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA22275 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 17:31:48 -0400 Message-Id: <200209102131.RAA22275@blackcomb.panasas.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5.9 07/25/2002 with nmh-1.0.4 To: exmh-users@example.com Subject: Re: Sorting In-Reply-To: <200209092354.g89Ns8g04304@lin12.triumf.ca> References: <200209092111.g89LBH703076@lin12.triumf.ca> <200209092354.g89Ns8g04304@lin12.triumf.ca> Comments: In-reply-to Rick Baartman message dated "Mon, 09 Sep 2002 16:54:08 -0700." From: Brent Welch X-Url: http://www.panasas.com/ X-Face: "HxE|?EnC9fVMV8f70H83&{fgLE.|FZ^$>@Q(yb#N,Eh~N]e&]=> r5~UnRml1:4EglY{9B+ :'wJq$@c_C!l8@<$t,{YUr4K,QJGHSvS~U]H`<+L*x?eGzSk>XH\W:AK\j?@?c1o List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion list for EXMH users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 14:31:48 -0700 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.9 required=7.0 tests=AWL,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,REFERENCES, SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,X_LOOP version=2.50-cvs X-Spam-Level: There is an "Update all scan caches" menu entry that rescans your folders similar to the short scripts folks have shared around. It runs in the background. >>>Rick Baartman said: > > > On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Rick Baartman wrote: > > Thanks Tom and Jacob. The above works, but without the double quotes: i.e. > > > > sh -c 'for f in `folders -recurse -fast` ; do sortm +"$f" ; done' > > > But there is a problem with making changes outside of exmh: the .xmhcache fi les > don't get updated. This is dangerous; I have to remember to re-scan each fol der > I enter. Is there a safeguard for this? > > -- > rick > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Exmh-users mailing list > Exmh-users@redhat.com > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users -- Brent Welch Software Architect, Panasas Inc Pioneering the World's Most Scalable and Agile Storage Network www.panasas.com welch@panasas.com _______________________________________________ Exmh-users mailing list Exmh-users@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users