From exmh-workers-admin@redhat.com Wed Aug 28 15:08:10 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.netnoteinc.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E3CC44155 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 10:08:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 28 Aug 2002 15:08:07 +0100 (IST) Received: from listman.example.com (listman.example.com [66.187.233.211]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7SEA6Z27663 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 15:10:07 +0100 Received: from listman.example.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8E3F40A57; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 10:10:14 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: exmh-workers@listman.example.com Received: from int-mx1.corp.example.com (int-mx1.corp.example.com [172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFD1B40A05 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 10:09:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from mail@localhost) by int-mx1.corp.example.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g7SE9Iq22132 for exmh-workers@listman.redhat.com; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 10:09:18 -0400 Received: from mx1.example.com (mx1.example.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g7SE9IY22128 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 10:09:18 -0400 Received: from ratree.psu.ac.th ([202.28.97.6]) by mx1.example.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g7SDs9l32404 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 09:54:11 -0400 Received: from delta.cs.mu.OZ.AU (dhcp253.cc.psu.ac.th [192.168.2.253]) by ratree.psu.ac.th (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7SE96U06027; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 21:09:06 +0700 (ICT) Received: from munnari.OZ.AU (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by delta.cs.mu.OZ.AU (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7SE6UW21101; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 21:06:30 +0700 (ICT) From: Robert Elz To: Chris Garrigues Cc: exmh-workers@example.com Subject: Re: New Sequences Window In-Reply-To: <1030028647.6462.TMDA@deepeddy.vircio.com> References: <1030028647.6462.TMDA@deepeddy.vircio.com> <1029945287.4797.TMDA@deepeddy.vircio.com> <1029882468.3116.TMDA@deepeddy.vircio.com> <9627.1029933001@munnari.OZ.AU> <1029943066.26919.TMDA@deepeddy.vircio.com> <1029944441.398.TMDA@deepeddy.vircio.com> <13277.1030015920@munnari.OZ.AU> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: <21099.1030543590@munnari.OZ.AU> X-Loop: exmh-workers@example.com Sender: exmh-workers-admin@example.com Errors-To: exmh-workers-admin@example.com X-Beenthere: exmh-workers@example.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion list for EXMH developers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 21:06:30 +0700 X-Pyzor: Reported 0 times. X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=7.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, X_LOOP version=2.40-cvs X-Spam-Level: Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 10:04:06 -0500 From: Chris Garrigues Message-ID: <1030028647.6462.TMDA@deepeddy.vircio.com> | hmmm, I assume you're going to report this to the nmh folks? It turns out, when I did some investigation, that my memory of how MH worked here was wrong (that's not unusual) - the -seq switch seems to have always done -nolist (requiring a subsequent -list to turn it on again). Given that, I have no idea how the pick code as it was ever worked. In fact, it quite possibly never did the way it was intended to (I have just been browsing the 2.5 sources, and that seems to be attempting to do things that I never saw happen). It may be that your new sequence method just exposed the bug that had been there all along. Given this, I won't be sending any bug reports to the nmh people. If nmh ever seems to be showing any signs further progress, and if I remember this then, I might send them a change request. The code to make the change is trivial. kre _______________________________________________ Exmh-workers mailing list Exmh-workers@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers