From exmh-workers-admin@redhat.com Mon Aug 26 16:02:06 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.netnoteinc.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6A6E44159 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 10:59:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 26 Aug 2002 15:59:55 +0100 (IST) Received: from listman.example.com (listman.example.com [66.187.233.211]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7QETrZ24800 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 15:29:53 +0100 Received: from listman.example.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AFB63F3B0; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 10:30:03 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: exmh-workers@listman.example.com Received: from int-mx1.corp.example.com (int-mx1.corp.example.com [172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF3893EEF8 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 10:29:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from mail@localhost) by int-mx1.corp.example.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g7QETRN12313 for exmh-workers@listman.redhat.com; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 10:29:27 -0400 Received: from mx1.example.com (mx1.example.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g7QETRY12309 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 10:29:27 -0400 Received: from austin-jump.vircio.com (IDENT:f0BF3PrOASQe3KDkXhU9BlKJvR5us9rz@jump-austin.vircio.com [192.12.3.99]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g7QEEZl05220 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 10:14:36 -0400 Received: (qmail 1462 invoked by uid 104); 26 Aug 2002 14:29:26 -0000 Received: from cwg-exmh@DeepEddy.Com by localhost.localdomain with qmail-scanner-0.90 (uvscan: v4.1.60/v4219. . Clean. Processed in 0.347504 secs); 26/08/2002 09:29:26 Received: from deepeddy.vircio.com ([10.1.2.1]) (envelope-sender ) by austin-jump.vircio.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 26 Aug 2002 14:29:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 11403 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2002 14:29:25 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO deepeddy.vircio.com) ([127.0.0.1]) (envelope-sender ) by localhost (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 26 Aug 2002 14:29:25 -0000 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Robert Elz Cc: exmh-workers@example.com Subject: Re: New Sequences Window In-Reply-To: <25409.1030190165@munnari.OZ.AU> References: <1030028647.6462.TMDA@deepeddy.vircio.com> <1029945287.4797.TMDA@deepeddy.vircio.com> <1029882468.3116.TMDA@deepeddy.vircio.com> <9627.1029933001@munnari.OZ.AU> <1029943066.26919.TMDA@deepeddy.vircio.com> <1029944441.398.TMDA@deepeddy.vircio.com> <13277.1030015920@munnari.OZ.AU> <25409.1030190165@munnari.OZ.AU> X-Url: http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg X-Image-Url: http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/chris.gif MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_-694865624P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1030372165.11396.TMDA@deepeddy.vircio.com> From: Chris Garrigues X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/0.57 Reply-To: Chris Garrigues X-Loop: exmh-workers@example.com Sender: exmh-workers-admin@example.com Errors-To: exmh-workers-admin@example.com X-Beenthere: exmh-workers@example.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion list for EXMH developers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 09:29:23 -0500 X-Pyzor: Reported 0 times. X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.2 required=7.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,X_LOOP version=2.40-cvs X-Spam-Level: --==_Exmh_-694865624P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > From: Robert Elz > Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 18:56:05 +0700 > > Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 10:04:06 -0500 > From: Chris Garrigues > Message-ID: <1030028647.6462.TMDA@deepeddy.vircio.com> > > | hmmm, I assume you're going to report this to the nmh folks? > > Yes, I will, sometime, after I look at the nmh sources and see what > they have managed to break, and why. > > But we really want exmh to operate with all the versions of nmh that > exist, don't we? The patch to have exmh do the right thing, whether this > bug exists, or not, is trivial, so I'd suggest including it. > > Patch follows ... > > I have no idea why the sequences were being added after the message list > before, not that it should make any difference to nmh (or MH). But since > I stopped doing that, the variable "msgs" isn't really needed any more, > rather than assigning $pick(msgs) to msgs, and then using $msgs the code > could just use $pick(msgs) where $msgs is now used. This is just a > frill though, so I didn't change that. I'll fix this in CVS this afternoon. Thanks, Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ virCIO http://www.virCIO.Com 716 Congress, Suite 200 Austin, TX 78701 +1 512 374 0500 World War III: The Wrong-Doers Vs. the Evil-Doers. --==_Exmh_-694865624P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.2_20000822 06/23/2000 iD8DBQE9ajtDK9b4h5R0IUIRAlFjAKCJRCAKR2dkmh5oqHfkagDddfmrBwCdH6vv FCRlUSeu14edQaoD4yCWoDQ= =+lzS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_-694865624P-- _______________________________________________ Exmh-workers mailing list Exmh-workers@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-workers