From fork-admin@xent.com Fri Aug 23 11:08:56 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.netnoteinc.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A091D47C70 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 06:06:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 23 Aug 2002 11:06:56 +0100 (IST) Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7N5EVZ11380 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 06:14:32 +0100 Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B70E2940D7; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 22:12:10 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: fork@example.com Received: from crank.slack.net (slack.net [166.84.151.181]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A7D2294099 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 22:11:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by crank.slack.net (Postfix, from userid 596) id 8F5E23EDE0; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 01:15:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by crank.slack.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DD423ECF3; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 01:15:29 -0400 (EDT) From: Tom To: Robert Harley Cc: fork@example.com Subject: Re: Entrepreneurs In-Reply-To: <20020823005705.D63AEC44E@argote.ch> Message-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: fork-admin@xent.com Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com X-Beenthere: fork@example.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 01:15:29 -0400 (EDT) X-Pyzor: Reported 0 times. X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=7.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST, SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,USER_AGENT_PINE version=2.40-cvs X-Spam-Level: On Fri, 23 Aug 2002, Robert Harley wrote: --]It's an amusing anecdote, I don't know if it's true or not, but certainly --]nothing here supports the authoritative sounding conclusion "Status: False". --] So thats the trick, just let any anecdotal utterances you LIKE be deemed true until proven false, and then hold other data to the opposite standard... Yeah, I see how that could be a handy tool RH. (before teh lablemongers are out and about, I could give a shit what BubbaU utters, its all shite. Kill your idols folks, your slips are showing) -tom http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork