From fork-admin@xent.com Wed Oct 2 11:47:44 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1]) by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C381516F17 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 11:47:33 +0100 (IST) Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 02 Oct 2002 11:47:33 +0100 (IST) Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g922HCK21343 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 03:17:13 +0100 Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73D8C2940EC; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 19:17:02 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: fork@example.com Received: from sccrmhc02.attbi.com (sccrmhc02.attbi.com [204.127.202.62]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE91E29409C for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 19:16:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [24.61.113.164] by sccrmhc02.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20021002021614.LNVR27763.sccrmhc02.attbi.com@[24.61.113.164]> for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 02:16:14 +0000 From: bitbitch@magnesium.net X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.61) Educational Reply-To: bitbitch@magnesium.net X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-Id: <17214982834.20021001221610@magnesium.net> To: Elias Subject: Re[2]: So I missed this one... In-Reply-To: <3D9A51BA.7090103@cse.ucsc.edu> References: <261233693.20021001182701@magnesium.net> <3D9A51BA.7090103@cse.ucsc.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: fork-admin@xent.com Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com X-Beenthere: fork@example.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 22:16:10 -0400 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST, NO_REAL_NAME,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,T_QUOTE_TWICE_2, US_DOLLARS_2,US_DOLLARS_4 version=2.50-cvs X-Spam-Level: Hello Elias, Tuesday, October 1, 2002, 9:54:02 PM, you wrote: E> bitbitch@magnesium.net wrote: >> Turns out the music industry settled ... quite a hefty >> settlement. E> Funnky, I thought that it was minor in comparison the the gouging that E> occurs on a standard CD. >> The Wall Street Journal >> Copyright (c) 2002, Dow Jones & Company, Inc. >> Tuesday, October 1, 2002 >> >> Five Music Concerns To Pay $143.1 Million In Price-Fixing Case >> Reuters News Service ... >> The companies, which didn't admit any wrongdoing, will pay $67.4 >> million in cash to compensate consumers who overpaid for CDs between >> 1995 and 2000. The companies also agreed to distribute $75.7 million >> worth of CDs to public entities and nonprofit organizations throughout >> the country. E> The CDs will probably cost less than 7.5 million to produce and E> distribute... "didn't admit any wrongdoing"?!? Give me a break. E> Elias Toobad none of this will go back to any of the people who were forced to pay the rates. -- Best regards, bitbitch mailto:bitbitch@magnesium.net