From fork-admin@xent.com Mon Sep 30 19:59:02 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1]) by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3605C16F22 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 19:57:36 +0100 (IST) Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 30 Sep 2002 19:57:36 +0100 (IST) Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8UIgEK11688 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 19:42:15 +0100 Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F7A2940E8; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 11:42:09 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: fork@example.com Received: from hotmail.com (dav76.law15.hotmail.com [64.4.22.211]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E3DF29409E for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 11:41:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 11:41:19 -0700 X-Originating-Ip: [207.202.171.254] From: "Mr. FoRK" To: References: <3D9859B9.3A7F80C2@endeavors.com> <10654501659.20020930110821@magnesium.net> <19164789201.20020930135949@magnesium.net> Subject: Re: Re[4]: A moment of silence for the First Amendment (fwd) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Message-Id: X-Originalarrivaltime: 30 Sep 2002 18:41:19.0466 (UTC) FILETIME=[F7704CA0:01C268B0] Sender: fork-admin@xent.com Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com X-Beenthere: fork@example.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 11:46:26 -0700 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, T_OUTLOOK_REPLY,T_URI_COUNT_0_1 version=2.50-cvs X-Spam-Level: ----- Original Message ----- From: > the parties -are- screaming and shouting over > political figures because they cannot be heard (to those figures) in > any other way. The right to speak is not the same as the right to be heard by the audience of the speakers choice. Disruptive protests might be a means to create awareness - but that's a pretty lame way to do it. If it truly is the only way, then I'm all for it, but disruption for the sake of showing how committed the protesters are is pretty weak.