From fork-admin@xent.com Tue Sep 24 17:55:25 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1]) by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6380A16F03 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 17:55:25 +0100 (IST) Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 24 Sep 2002 17:55:25 +0100 (IST) Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8OFN0C09794 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 16:23:00 +0100 Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3B8B2940B5; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 08:19:08 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: fork@example.com Received: from jamesr.best.vwh.net (jamesr.best.vwh.net [192.220.76.165]) by xent.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 6D2D629409A for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 08:18:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 14882 invoked by uid 19621); 24 Sep 2002 15:20:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO avalon) ([64.125.200.18]) (envelope-sender ) by 192.220.76.165 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 24 Sep 2002 15:20:37 -0000 Subject: RE: liberal defnitions From: James Rogers To: fork@example.com In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1032881662.24435.8.camel@avalon> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.2-5mdk Sender: fork-admin@xent.com Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com X-Beenthere: fork@example.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: 24 Sep 2002 08:40:17 -0700 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES version=2.50-cvs X-Spam-Level: This situation wouldn't have happened in the first place if California didn't have economically insane regulations. They created a regulatory climate that facilitated this. So yes, it is the product of over-regulation. -James Rogers jamesr@best.com On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 05:17, Geege Schuman wrote: > from slate's "today's papers": > The New York Times and Los Angeles Times both lead with word that > a federal judge ruled yesterday that the nation's largest > national gas pipeline company, El Paso, illegally withheld gas > from the market during California's energy squeeze in 2000-01. > The judge concluded that El Paso left 21 percent of its capacity > in the state off-line, thus driving up the price of gas and > helping to induce rolling blackouts. > > and this is the product of overregulation?