From fork-admin@xent.com Mon Sep 23 22:47:34 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1]) by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21FAA16F03 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 22:47:34 +0100 (IST) Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 23 Sep 2002 22:47:34 +0100 (IST) Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8NJQvC31734 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 20:26:58 +0100 Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF9EB2940A9; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 12:23:07 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: fork@example.com Received: from cats.ucsc.edu (cats-mx2.ucsc.edu [128.114.129.35]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC8F129409A for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 12:22:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Tycho (dhcp-55-196.cse.ucsc.edu [128.114.55.196]) by cats.ucsc.edu (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id g8NJPgT24139; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 12:25:43 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jim Whitehead" To: "Robert Harley" , Subject: RE: Goodbye Global Warming Message-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20020923090605.0A6ABC44D@argote.ch> Importance: Normal X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Ucsc-Cats-Mailscanner: Found to be clean Sender: fork-admin@xent.com Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com X-Beenthere: fork@example.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 12:23:08 -0700 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT version=2.50-cvs X-Spam-Level: > Gary Lawrence Murphy wrote: > >and say hello to the cool: Oooo ... /this/ is going to cause > some stir ... > > Of course not. Some people just don't want to be confused by the facts. For anyone to fully bury global warming, they would need to explain why the dramatic increase in CO2 concentrations are not increasing the global temperature. They would also need to explain why, worldwide, glaciers are melting faster than they have previously in the historical record. That is, people need more than refutations, they need a compelling alternate explanation (hint: climate variability doesn't cover all the bases). - Jim