From fork-admin@xent.com  Fri Sep 20 16:15:28 2002
Return-Path: <fork-admin@xent.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B7D716F03
	for <jm@localhost>; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 16:15:27 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 20 Sep 2002 16:15:27 +0100 (IST)
Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
    (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8KDVtC07056 for <jm@jmason.org>;
    Fri, 20 Sep 2002 14:31:55 +0100
Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
    with ESMTP id DE396294177; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 06:28:12 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: fork@example.com
Received: from imo-d10.mx.aol.com (imo-d10.mx.aol.com [205.188.157.42]) by
    xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6519529409C for <fork@xent.com>;
    Fri, 20 Sep 2002 06:27:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ThosStew@aol.com by imo-d10.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.11.)
    id k.53.1c91dda8 (3310); Fri, 20 Sep 2002 09:30:30 -0400 (EDT)
From: ThosStew@aol.com
Message-Id: <53.1c91dda8.2abc7cf6@aol.com>
Subject: Re: [meta-forkage]
To: dl@silcom.com, fork@example.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Mac sub 45
Sender: fork-admin@xent.com
Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com
X-Beenthere: fork@example.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:fork@example.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>, <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare <fork.xent.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>,
    <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://xent.com/pipermail/fork/>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 09:30:30 EDT
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.1 required=5.0
	tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,NO_REAL_NAME
	version=2.50-cvs
X-Spam-Level: 


In a message dated 9/19/2002 3:45:45 PM, dl@silcom.com writes:

>I don't mind if people advocate nuking
>gay baby whales for jesus, if they can
>make a good, original, argument for it.


I can't imagine any other kind of argument for nuking gay baby whales for 
jesus. But do you mean nuking baby gay whales who are for jesus; or nuking 
baby gay whales for Jesus's sake?

splitting hairs with a FoRK,

Tom