From fork-admin@xent.com Sat Sep 7 21:54:01 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1]) by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EE1D16F49 for ; Sat, 7 Sep 2002 21:52:44 +0100 (IST) Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Sat, 07 Sep 2002 21:52:44 +0100 (IST) Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g87ID8C28529 for ; Sat, 7 Sep 2002 19:13:08 +0100 Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45BFE29417C; Sat, 7 Sep 2002 11:10:04 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: fork@example.com Received: from isolnetsux.techmonkeys.net (isolnetsux.techmonkeys.net [64.243.46.20]) by xent.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D1A3129409E for ; Sat, 7 Sep 2002 11:09:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 11729 invoked by uid 501); 7 Sep 2002 18:11:42 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 7 Sep 2002 18:11:42 -0000 From: CDale To: Geege Schuman Cc: Russell Turpin , Subject: RE: Selling Wedded Bliss (was Re: Ouch...) In-Reply-To: Message-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: fork-admin@xent.com Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com X-Beenthere: fork@example.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2002 13:11:42 -0500 (CDT) X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.8 required=7.0 tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,HOTMAIL_FOOTER5,HOT_NASTY,IN_REP_TO, KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE, SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT_PINE version=2.50-cvs X-Spam-Level: Hah. I guess she doesn't want everyone to know about all the kinky sex she and I have had. LOL C On Sat, 7 Sep 2002, Geege Schuman wrote: > cdale is a double chocolate chip macadamia to my vanilla wafer. wait, maybe > i'm a ginger snap. > > > gg > > -----Original Message----- > From: fork-admin@xent.com [mailto:fork-admin@xent.com]On Behalf Of > Russell Turpin > Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2002 11:06 AM > To: fork@example.com > Subject: Re: Selling Wedded Bliss (was Re: Ouch...) > > > Robert Harley: > >It is perfectly obvious that (heterosexual) promiscuity is exactly, > >precisely identical between males and females. > > Yeah, assuming approximately equal populations. > But that obscures the different modes of > promiscuity. Both the person who gives sex for > money or power or companionship and the person > who uses money and power and companionship to > get sex are promiscuous, in the broadest sense > of the word. But their motives and behavior are > quite different. > > Langur monkeys were the example in the cited > article. "Dominant males .. kill babies that > are not their own." "The dominant male monkey > .. seeks to defend his harem of females." But > cozying up to the current dominant male isn't > the best strategy for female langurs, because > "dominant males are dethroned by rivals every > 27 months or so." "By mating with as many > extra-group males as possible, female langurs > ensure their offspring against infanticide," > by the male who is likely next to rule the > roost. > > Maybe it's just me, but that doesn't paint a > picture of carefree females engaged in joyously > promiscuous couplings. The dom cab driver who > is taking her two boy toys to New Orleans is a > better picture of that. ;-) > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com > > > > > -- "I don't take no stocks in mathematics, anyway" --Huckleberry Finn