From fork-admin@xent.com Sat Sep 7 21:53:19 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1]) by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6060316F1F for ; Sat, 7 Sep 2002 21:52:31 +0100 (IST) Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Sat, 07 Sep 2002 21:52:31 +0100 (IST) Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g875g8C08186 for ; Sat, 7 Sep 2002 06:42:09 +0100 Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 624FC2940CE; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 22:39:04 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: fork@example.com Received: from sccrmhc01.attbi.com (sccrmhc01.attbi.com [204.127.202.61]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4B0F29409E for ; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 22:38:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Intellistation ([66.31.2.27]) by sccrmhc01.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020907054108.EMT9751.sccrmhc01.attbi.com@Intellistation> for ; Sat, 7 Sep 2002 05:41:08 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Eirikur Hallgrimsson Organization: Electric Brain To: FoRK@xent.com Subject: Re: Re[2]: Selling Wedded Bliss (was Re: Ouch...) User-Agent: KMail/1.4.1 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <200209070140.32845.eh@mad.scientist.com> Sender: fork-admin@xent.com Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com X-Beenthere: fork@example.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2002 01:40:32 -0400 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.8 required=7.0 tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST, NOSPAM_INC,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,RCVD_IN_MULTIHOP_DSBL, RCVD_IN_UNCONFIRMED_DSBL,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_KMAIL version=2.50-cvs X-Spam-Level: On Friday 06 September 2002 06:16 am, Eugen Leitl wrote: > I don't know what exactly is wrong, but something is definitely wrong. > This is way too important to be left to just our intuition of what is > right and what is wrong. This is one of those formally difficult points from a philosophy perspective. You can't really throw out intuition and emotion because reason really only gets you answers that reflect the genome and the ancestral environment. Going forward requires creativity and experiment. Eirikur