From fork-admin@xent.com Fri Sep 6 18:46:52 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1]) by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE30A16F16 for ; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 18:46:51 +0100 (IST) Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 06 Sep 2002 18:46:51 +0100 (IST) Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g86Hk6C18090 for ; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 18:46:07 +0100 Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B620029429E; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 10:43:03 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: fork@example.com Received: from cats.ucsc.edu (cats-mx2.ucsc.edu [128.114.129.35]) by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58941294296 for ; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 10:42:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Tycho (dhcp-63-177.cse.ucsc.edu [128.114.63.177]) by cats.ucsc.edu (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id g86GvAT00774 for ; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 09:57:11 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jim Whitehead" To: "FoRK" Subject: Googlecooking Message-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Importance: Normal Sender: fork-admin@xent.com Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com X-Beenthere: fork@example.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 09:54:52 -0700 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.4 required=7.0 tests=AWL,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, TO_LOCALPART_EQ_REAL,USER_AGENT_OUTLOOK version=2.50-cvs X-Spam-Level: Originally linked by Dave's Scripting News: http://www.megnut.com/archive.asp?which=2002_09_01_archive.inc#000194 We've got Googlewhacking, Googlebombing and now we can add Googlecooking to our lexicon. My mother types whatever ingredients she has on hand into Google and then picks the most appealing recipe returned in the results. What a good idea! - Jim