From rssfeeds@jmason.org Wed Oct 2 11:43:41 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1]) by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 224B116F16 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 11:43:41 +0100 (IST) Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 02 Oct 2002 11:43:41 +0100 (IST) Received: from dogma.slashnull.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g92818K31710 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 09:01:08 +0100 Message-Id: <200210020801.g92818K31710@dogma.slashnull.org> To: yyyy@example.com From: boingboing Subject: Record industry defends practices to Senate Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 08:01:08 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; encoding=utf-8 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-684.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL version=2.50-cvs X-Spam-Level: URL: http://boingboing.net/#85513221 Date: Not supplied The Joint Hearing of the Senate Committee and Senate Select Committee on the Entertainment Industry is underway in LA, investigating artists' claims that the labels engage in unfair and corrupt business-practices. The first day's findings at the hearings are really quite remarkable: By contract, artists are prohibited from showing royalty statements to third parties. Normally this would not include their mangers, lawyers, consultants, or others who could aid them in getting paid, but apparently this is not necessarily the case. Senator Kevin Murray, leading the initiative for artists' rights, claimed the that Cary Sherman, Chief Counsel for the RIAA himself, said to him in an interview, that RIAA members (the major labels) would sue any artist that broke ranks and shared information with the Committee. This claim was rejected by Sherman but supported by others in the room. Don Henley, among them, outwardly dared his record company to sue him for bringing royalty statements to the hearing. He presented his most recent royalty statement for "Hell Freezes Over," which showed the panel that even though his contract called for a no more than a 10% "reserve" on sales of records shipped, Universal Music had held back more than that for eleven pay periods (roughly under three years) and that, even though his contract calls for no free goods in Europe, they had deducted $87,000 in free goods charges to Europe. Link[1] Discuss[2] (_Thanks, Paul!_) [1] http://www.musicdish.com/mag/?id=6675 [2] http://www.quicktopic.com/boing/H/jU9jRkFhUcp