From pudge@perl.org Tue Sep 24 10:47:07 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.example.com Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1]) by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F08AC16F03 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 10:47:06 +0100 (IST) Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jm@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 24 Sep 2002 10:47:07 +0100 (IST) Received: from cpu59.osdn.com (slashdot.org [64.28.67.73] (may be forged)) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8O209C16185 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 03:00:09 +0100 Received: from [10.2.181.14] (helo=perl.org) by cpu59.osdn.com with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17texC-0002N7-01 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 21:57:34 -0400 Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 02:00:34 +0000 From: pudge@perl.org Subject: [use Perl] Stories for 2002-09-24 To: yyyy-use-perl@example.com Precedence: list X-Bulkmail: 2.051 Message-Id: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,EXCUSE_1,NO_REAL_NAME version=2.50-cvs X-Spam-Level: use Perl Daily Newsletter In this issue: * This Week on perl5-porters (16-22 September 2002) * The Great Perl Monger Cull Of 2002 +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ | This Week on perl5-porters (16-22 September 2002) | | posted by rafael on Monday September 23, @07:58 (summaries) | | http://use.perl.org/article.pl?sid=02/09/23/125230 | +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ That's on a week like this that you realize that lots of porters are European (and managed to free themselves for YAPC::Europe.) Or were they, on the contrary, too busy in the big blue room ? On the other hand, the number of bug reports stayed at its habitual average level. This story continues at: http://use.perl.org/article.pl?sid=02/09/23/125230 Discuss this story at: http://use.perl.org/comments.pl?sid=02/09/23/125230 +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ | The Great Perl Monger Cull Of 2002 | | posted by ziggy on Monday September 23, @16:38 (news) | | http://use.perl.org/article.pl?sid=02/09/23/2041201 | +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ [0]davorg writes "If you take a look at [1]list of local groups on the [2]Perl Mongers web site, you'll see that it's just got a good deal shorter. Over the last month or so, I've been making strenuous efforts to contact all of the groups we had listed to see which ones were still active. What you see is the result of this exercise. Almost half of the groups have been removed because they haven't responded to my emails. If your local group still exists but is no longer listed, then that means that I don't have an update to date contact for your group. Please [3]let me know if that's the case." Discuss this story at: http://use.perl.org/comments.pl?sid=02/09/23/2041201 Links: 0. mailto:dave@dave.org.uk 1. http://www.pm.org/groups/ 2. http://www.pm.org/ 3. mailto:user_groups@pm.org Copyright 1997-2002 pudge. All rights reserved. ====================================================================== You have received this message because you subscribed to it on use Perl. To stop receiving this and other messages from use Perl, or to add more messages or change your preferences, please go to your user page. http://use.perl.org/my/messages/ You can log in and change your preferences from there.