Return-Path: guido@python.org Delivery-Date: Sat Sep 7 07:06:31 2002 From: guido@python.org (Guido van Rossum) Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2002 02:06:31 -0400 Subject: [Spambayes] Ditching WordInfo In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 06 Sep 2002 22:48:17 PDT." References: <200209070533.g875XN813509@pcp02138704pcs.reston01.va.comcast.net> Message-ID: <200209070606.g8766Vf13736@pcp02138704pcs.reston01.va.comcast.net> > > Maybe. I batch messages using fetchmail (don't ask why), and adding > > .4 seconds per message for a batch of 50 (not untypical) feels like a > > real wait to me... > > Yeesh. Sounds like what you need is something to kick up once and score > an entire mailbox. > > Wait a second... So *that's* why you wanted -u. > > If you can spare the memory, you might get better performance in this > case using the pickle store, since it only has to go to disk once (but > boy, does it ever go to disk!) I can't think of anything obvious to > speed things up once it's all loaded into memory, though. That's > profiler territory, and profiling is exactly the kind of optimization > I just said I wasn't going to do :) We could have a server mode (someone described this as an SA option). --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)